Introduction

The new Government that has been established in the country of Sri Lanka is currently has been focusing on changing the face of the entire country as per the development of the country is considered. The transformation of the country in this aspect of construction is currently being focused at as Sri Lanka is still considered to be a developing country (Athapaththu and Karunasena 2018). The growth of the country is dependent on the several challenges that is looked upon at with the development of the construction sector at a much bigger level, like the establishment of the mega projects to make Sri Lanka enjoy the benefits of all the physical developments that have been made to make the country appear better than ever. At the same time, it has been found that the country is looking forward to these developments by the mega projects to make it as beautiful with lesser efforts to maintain the adjacent features in the constructional area as well (Dias et al. 2016). The way of constructing has evolved in such a way that the human activities in the day to day lives of an individual has been developed into the easiest and most effortless aspect with the influence of technology in construction (Silva et al. 2015). This is why, the government in Sri Lanka has been trying to implement the Mega project by which the entire country would be transformed into a Global Centre by its digital and physical transformation by transforming the Port City. The project has been funded and managed by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC). This aspect is just not regarded as the way by which the constructional aspect of the country is going to be transformed but, the mega project would also consider the changes to be occurring in the form of the constructional changes including technological aspects, like transforming the Port City. I would like to present this reflective report identifying the ways by which the mega projects are being handled for the transformation of the Port City for the understanding of the various aspects of the development of the mega project as well as providing my personal reflection on the advantages and issues about the mega project according to my personal understanding about the construction of the Port City. The reflective report would have my personal views on the development of the mega project and I would present my personal views on how the entire project funded by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) would have a possible outcome according to the procedures followed for the building of the mega project and the principles to consider

Critical appraisal for the concept of the Mega project for Transforming Sri Lanka into a World Class country by developing the Port City

The Port City in Colombo, Sri Lanka is regarded as the primary financial zone in the country which also facilitates the infusion of the international financial areas as well. I found out that this area is extremely important to the country as well as various neighbouring countries like China, India and others that frequently indulges in business activities with Sri Lanka. This is why, the Chinese and the Indian organizations both wanted to house for the financial needs for the development of the mega project so that the development would just not affect the development of the country but would also enhance the different aspects of the South East Asian countries considering the beautification, the economical and the non-financial perspectives of the area. I would also present my perspectives on these perspectives along with the nature and paradox of the project in the next section.

The Financial and Non-Financial perspectives

Behind the development of the Port City and the organizations of China financing it, there are various concepts that I have notices. These concepts have also represented the ways by which the development has considered the inclusion of the basic beautification of the bay area in Sri Lanka as well as the separate ways by which the economic functionality of the system can also be enhanced. This is to specify that the mega project has been not only funded by the organization to make sure that the perspectives of the Chinese organization to enhance the south-east Asian countries and their beautification, but there are other specifications concerning the economic background of the country behind the development as well. I understand that there are various reasons for which the Chinese organizations might find it beneficial for the economic development of the country, where at the same time, there are other goals that might be present for the organization behind funding the Mega Project. Following, I would like to present the financial and the non-financial perspectives behind the development of the Mega Project for the construction and development of the Port City:

Financial Perspectives: The Chinese organizations of China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) have invested a huge sum of amount, almost about 1.5 billion equivalent USD for the Mega Project for the development of the Port City in Colombo under the initiative of One Belt One Road (Weerakoon and Jayasuriya 2019). This project has been declared as a Mega Project only for the reason that Sri Lanka was still a developing country and creating such a project at this large scale would not be able to be completed by the country and the government funds given the scale of the project. There are other reasons related to the financial development of the country as well. According to the plan that has been proposed by the funding organizations and the government of Sri Lanka, I believe that it would just not economically enhance the different aspects of the employees working for the Mega Project, the stakeholders and the end product user of the Port City plan, but it would also help in the enhancement of the developing country of Sri Lanka to be established as an economically stronger country than other developing ones and would also enhance Colombo City as an International Financial City.

Other than that, I believe, the development of the city by a mega project would not only enhance on the development of the city or the country but the associated people as well. This is why, I have analyzed how the project is helping the people involved with the project for the enhancement of the employees involved with the project as well. The total mega project and its revenue calculation needed to be justified for this case as well, and by this, I have found out that for the financial year ending December 2017, CCCC recorded a revenue of 79.4 billion USD equivalent with total assets of 183 billion USD equivalent. With this project, the organization of CCCC was ranked 91st among Fortune 500 companies in 2018 and ranked 3rd on ENR Top International Contractor in 2018. Therefore, the project was indeed looking forward towards the mega project as it could have raised the financial condition of the country as a whole.

Other than the financial aspects, there were extreme involvement of humanitarian prospects as well. The non-financial prospects and aspects of the issue in this case would be provided in the next section:

Non-financial Perspectives: The urban development of the mega project has been one of the financial perspectives of the entire development behind the port city, but it also needs to be kept in mind that the total development of the country would not only benefit the organization financially but also helps the country in the broader prospects and helps in acquiring a better objective for the country. Sri Lanka has always been identified as a developing country rather than a developed country and therefore, the mega project development should be done in such a larger scale that the entire country would be benefitted, not just the area that is under the construction. However, this is entirely my own perspective and I would like to inform that I have found this exact same implementation in case of the Port City mega project development. Since, Sri Lanka was not financially strong enough to house such a huge project, the organizations from China sponsored the prospects. I know that a mega project is much different than a normal project and occurs at huge dimensions with their outcome and affect on the most possible number of members; therefore, I understand China’s intension behind financing the mega project. I do not chide China by stating the fact that this could be a good opportunity to have grounds in the Sri Lankan market and this has been the driving motive. Instead, I would state this as somewhat a philanthropic view on sponsoring such a huge project, understanding that this would not be just another way by which the market acquisition can be achieved. Therefore, this can be considered as one of the major non-financial factors or perspectives that could be focused on behind the project.

I also understand that housing a mega project about such a large-scale development would also make Sri Lanka be part of one of the most advanced countries in the world map. The development and recognition of the country would also help the development of the internal structure of the country, other than the enhancement of the beautification of the external view. As a developing country, the urban development of the country is extremely necessary and so there has been the development of this mega project.

In addition to that, there has been a support programme for the fishermen as well based on the Port City development. The agreement that was legally made between the sponsors, the executives and the team behind the Mega Project were all bound to have the responsibility for the funding of the support programme for the fishermen over the area where the construction would most probably hamper their day to day individual business operation. Maybe, the financial perspective behind this added to the humanitarian grounds as well. This has helped in the identifying the non-financial prospects as well. There were other prospects of the Mega Project as well that were non-financial in nature. It was easy to identify that since it is a Mega Project, the area in which the construction was about to happen would be highly affected at the coverage was over 270 acres of land for the construction project and there would also be the involvement of over 4,000 Sri Lankan citizen that were to be affected by the outcomes of the project. Understanding this fact has made it easier to establish how the working structure of the project with the construction of the Port City would affect the land altogether. I also found out that the identification of the affected area had a huge input of business prospects that added to the Sri Lankan economy. Not being able to understand the responsibility of the Mega Project executives could have damaged the entire economy of the country. This is why, the organizations sponsoring the project came under contract with the government to agree to financially support the systems that would otherwise be affected as well.

This is why, I found out about another agreement that was made between the government and the sponsors. Which included the verifying of the transport facilities and the infrastructure of the Sri Lankan areas in which the construction was done. The agreement was made under the investments to be made by the sponsors about the roads and the utility facilities with the involvement of the reclaimed area where it was evident that the transport would be haltered. In addition, there was another involvement of the reclaimed area where the agreement also included that the probability of the damage would also be maintained. In the original agreement, it was found that an Estate Management Company or EMC was owned totally by GOSL and they would bear the maintenance and repairing in the adjacent areas as per the requirements. For this operation, if any investor would be considered, it would have the involvement of the Chinese organizations that have been responsible behind the funding of the Port City development project. This is why the mega project is also regarded as the Goodwill Project that is to ensure the involvement of the Sri Lankan President and the Prime Minister of China.

Consideration about the scale

As I have also stated the facts that the project was not a general project. It has already been identified as a Mega Project. It is already a known fact that the concept of Mega Projects is not constrained only to the development of a single process or a small construction. The scale of a Mega Project is extremely elevated since the involvement of every project constraint is huge in every aspect. A Mega Project is declared by the multi-level approach that is has and the huge prospect that it works on. The mega projects mostly are the larger-scaled programs that are identified as the most important ones for both the projects and the areas in which the projects are located in. Sometimes, the focus is at such a larger scale that there has not just been any involvement of the areas and the associated people for the project but also for the entire country in which the construction would be set in. The focus to the complexity of the infrastructure is also dependent on the declaration of the scale. This is why, I would like to state the fact that the project is a largely affective one to the country of Sri Lanka and also the ways by which the economy of the project affects the economic state of the country as well. The multi-billion-dollar project that has been regarded as one of the primary ambitions of China for constructing the Port City bay is one of the most important aspect to determine the scale of the project.

I have found out that the project was entirely build up from the aspect of the Chinese government who invested almost over 1.5 billion USD worth of money for the project. This makes it easier to understand that the project is not at all a probable idea to develop just a single unit of the city but the construction is going to affect a huge area of the city that has the potential to further affect the total population and economic system of the country as well. Since, Sri Lanka is a still developing country, there is a huge possibility that these effects would be multiplied to have a harsher effect on the country. I believe, the effect of the project being a failure or a success has the ability to affect a huge amount of people and area in the country further multiplying the effect as Sri Lanka does not have proper economy or infrastructure of coping up with the failure either. The amount of money involved is indeed a factor for declaring the project as a mega project. The reclamation of the sea area was also involved in this factor where the Port City construction has been found to be covering an area over 270 acres of land, that also includes the affect that would be laid on the individual or organized business of the area, further affecting the economy of the country. Therefore, this provides a much important understanding of the entire project to identify that the scale of the project is huge. The impact being on the entire country, the huge amount of money invested by the Chinese organizations, the large area of land coverage and the extensive outcome of the project makes it easy for me to identify this project as a Mega Project. In addition, the total time taken for the entire project was over 25 months. Therefore, the project is an extremely larger scaled one considering it to be a Mega Project.

Nature and paradox of the project 

As per my understanding of the entire project and it dependent on the design of the project where the project happens to be providing the outcome by the execution, control, monitoring and the design of the project. As per my understandings, the nature of the project in this case is dependent on the varied amount of the execution that has been provided to the different aspects of the areas of Sri Lanka. In my understanding, this is an Integrative Nature that I have seen in the project as the temporary endeavour has been taken to have a total involvement in creating something new that was not taken up by the government of Sri Lanka at all because of the amount of money and impact it would have the entire country as a whole.

On the other hand, the paradox of a project is stated by the ways in which any project plans to delivers a certain plan which forms the baseline of the project, but it fails in delivering the same. In this project as well, I have identified that there indeed lies a paradox. This is identified as the ways by which the intensions of the Chinese organizations were not identified before. I have come across the idea of the organizations where initially they were delivering their helping hand in the form of monetary transactions with the implementations of the plan for the Port City bay construction with monetary inputs, but there were still no identification of the intentions of the Chinese organizations as they wanted their share off the Sri Lankan market. This is why the paradox of the project has been stated since the identification of the proper intention of the Chinese organizations were not identified till the project was completed. This resulted in a conflict between the Chinese and the Sri Lankan government.

Assess the project management practices associated with the Mega project for Transforming Sri Lanka into a Global Centre

The transformation of the Port City area in Colombo was focused on the transformation of the entire area which has been identified to be the most ambitious mega project that is dependent on the mega project practices. For this project, the practices that were applied and that I have identified can be listed as below:

• The project was first diagnosed about the huge complexity that the project would have and that referred to the development of the project complexity model.
• Furthermore, I also found out that the competent leaders that were used for the project had their complexity profile checked out before they applied for the identification of the project complexity.
• Then, the project approach was selected to understand how the profile for the construction would be complex enough to provide a proper solution in reducing the complexity in the most economic way possible, adhering to all the contracts that has been set between the governments of both the countries.
• The total focus is dependent on the management of the complexity to identify what to present as the deliverables for the project.

Critical analysis about the challenges in the Mega project for Transforming Sri Lanka into a Global Centre 

The challenges that were critically analysed by me about the mega project for the transformation of Sri Lanka, I identified that the major challenges were about the claims that China and the organization of China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) had on the Port City bay. They had claimed that the Silk Road Economic Belt and the area under construction be developed by the completion of the project to the Chinese government, which was not at all agreed to by any contract. Since, the proposed plan in 2013 had presented the multi-billion-dollar project financed by the Chinese organizations, there had been a major issue about violating contracts, resulting into rifts between the governments.

Considering the aspects of sustainability

The sustainability of the project was assured by the Chinese organizations and since it was a mega budget construction project, the sustainability was taken care of. The sustainability had to be maintained in this case, as failing of the project would result into the economic disaster of both the countries as it was a multibillion-dollar project.

Considering the aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility 

As far as my concern about projects delivering their own outcomes, the Corporate Social Responsibility should also be taken care of to help the provision of taking care of all the collateral damages that have been made by the project. It needs to be mentioned here that since the project is a mega project, the affected area by the outcome of the project would also be huge. The affected area would be the market and the individual business of the area that would be considered as the area under collateral damage. The agreement that was made between both the governments have declared that the Chinese organizations would take care of the area, the market and the individuals in the entire country but especially focusing on the affected area that would be considered as a collateral damage for the organization. Therefore, this is why Corporate Social Responsibility is considered in this case.

Considering the aspects of Ethics across the lifecycle of the project

The ethical aspect was not maintained in this case, as there had been situations where I have identified in this project that the involvement of the Chinese organizations of China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) were not only dependent on the humanitarian grounds but also wanted to acquire the market area of the Sri Lankan bay area. This was not identified to be the initial requirement of the Chinese Government, and this has initiated a huge rift between the governments of both the areas. The identification of the number of people involved, the identification of the time and money involved made me understand how a construction mega project operates and how the issues occurring in such large-scale projects are handled.

Conclusion

Therefore, in conclusion, I would like to state the facts that there are various aspects that I have understood about the implementations and completion of the Mega Project behind the construction of the Port city bay in Sri Lanka, sponsored by the Chinese Organizations China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC). The project was also managed well by these organizations and has been declared as one of the primary mega projects that had the probability of shaping up of the entire country as a whole. I have presented my reflection of the entire project by critically analysing all the aspects of the project. This analysis has made me understood that a project is far more different than a mega project based on a huge variety of critical systems and criteria. One of the major criteria that I have specified in the above reflective report is about the financial and non-financial perspectives of the entire project. I have successfully identified that the analysis of scale and nature of any project also can decide the effect of a project depending on the size of the project. With this, I gained insights on how a project is dependent on these factors to decide whether a project is small or mega. The analysis of the Port City bay construction project made me understand that a project of such a huge scale like this might also have discrepancies that are identified by the paradox of the project. I have identified in this project that the involvement of the Chinese organizations of China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), and the China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) were not only dependent on the humanitarian grounds but also wanted to acquire the market area of the Sri Lankan bay area. This was not identified to be the initial requirement of the Chinese Government, and this has initiated a huge rift between the governments of both the areas. The identification of the number of people involved, the identification of the time and money involved made me understand how a construction mega project operates and how the issues occurring in such large-scale projects are handled. However, it is still a very complex issue to be determined about the mega project as it also has several other aspects to serve as well. There is involvement of Corporate Social Responsibility behind the entire project as well as the involvement of ethical and legal issues as well, that the project needs to serve. I have understood what the project has done, with a critical analysis of what could have been theoretically correct and how could the issues be definitely eliminated given the huge scale of the project and its total impact on not just Sri Lanka but both the countries.

Bibliography

AlSanad, S., 2017. Megaproject and Risk Management: A Case of Kuwait. In Book of Proceedings 5th International Conference On Sustainable Development (p. 79).

Athapaththu, K.I. and Karunasena, G., 2018. Framework for sustainable construction practices in Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(1), pp.51-63.

Brockmann, C., Brezinski, H. and Erbe, A., 2016. Innovation in construction megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11), p.04016059.

Brooks, A. and Rich, H., 2016. Sustainable construction and socio‐technical transitions in London’s mega‐projects. The Geographical Journal, 182(4), pp.395-405.

De Silva, S.U., Sachindrani, D.M.T.M., Hatharasinghe, H.A.C.D. and Bogahawatte, I., 2015. The contradiction between sustainable development and economic development: Special reference to the Colombo Port City project of Sri Lanka.

De Silva, S.U., Sachindrani, D.M.T.M., Hatharasinghe, H.A.C.D. and Bogahawatte, I., 2015. The contradiction between sustainable development and economic development: Special reference to the Colombo Port City project of Sri Lanka.

Dias, I., Perera, L., Bandara, S. and Lim, K.S., 2016, November. Review of Internal and External Transportation Issues of Artificial City Developments: Port City, Colombo, Sri Lanka. In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 38th, 2016, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Dias, I., Perera, L., Bandara, S. and Lim, K.S., 2016, November. Review of Internal and External Transportation Issues of Artificial City Developments: Port City, Colombo, Sri Lanka. In Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 38th, 2016, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Diminige, N. and Attalage, R.A., 2017. District cooling potential for mega developments in Sri Lanka.

Diminige, N. and Attalage, R.A., 2017. District cooling potential for mega developments in Sri Lanka.

El-Sabek, L.M. and McCabe, B.Y., 2017. Coordination Challenges of Production Planning & Control in International Mega-Projects: A Case Study. Lean Construction Journal.

Hali, S.M., Shukui, T. and Iqbal, S., 2015. One belt and one road: impact on China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Strategic Studies, 34(4), pp.147-164.

Harty, C. and Whyte, J., 2010. The role of media in construction design work and ecologies of practice. American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Construction and Engineering Management, 136(4), pp.468-476.

He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y. and Chan, A.P., 2015. Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China—A fuzzy analytic network process analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), pp.549-563.

Hu, Y., Chan, A.P. and Le, Y., 2015. Pragmatic framework of programme organizational capability for delivering megaprojects at design and construction phases: a Chinese client perspective. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 5(2-3), pp.49-62.

Hu, Y., Chan, A.P., Le, Y., Xu, Y. and Shan, M., 2016. Developing a program organization performance index for delivering construction megaprojects in China: fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(4), p.05016007.

Jacob, J.T., 2015. China-Sri Lanka Ties Post-Rajapaksa: Major Changes Unlikely. ICS Analysis, 26, pp.1-7.

Jayasuriya, S. and Weerakoon, D., 2019. Introduction: Challenges and Opportunities of Sri Lanka’s Post-conflict Economic Development Overview. In Managing Domestic and International Challenges and Opportunities in Post-conflict Development (pp. 1-12). Springer, Singapore.

JIANG, M.D., HU, Y.Y. and WANG, W.G., 2017. A Study on the Dynamic Mechanism of Optimizing Tidal Flats Development. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, (seme).

Jianlin, Z., Yamin, Z. and Laihui, X., 2018. Sri Lanka and The 21st–Century Silk Road. China Belt and Road Initiative Journal: Research Analysis and Perspectives, 1(2), pp.1-38.

Keethaponcalan, S.I., 2015. Dragon in the tear drop: Regional dynamics of growing Chinese influence in Sri Lanka. In Global China: Internal and external reaches (pp. 317-337).

Kelegama, S., 2014. China–Sri Lanka Economic Relations: An Overview. China Report, 50(2), pp.131-149.

Ko, S., Chi, S., Kim, J. and Song, J., 2017. Development of Progress Measurement Framework for Mega Construction Project. Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 37(2), pp.419-425.

Kumara, Y.G.I.S. and Weerakoon, K.G.P.K., 2014. Review of Port City as a Place; Port City in Hambantota, Sri Lanka. European Academic Research, 2(2), pp.2350-2370.

Li, M., Ma, Z. and Tang, X., 2019. Owner-dominated building information modeling and lean construction in a megaproject. Frontiers of Engineering Management, pp.1-12.

Li, Y., Han, Y., Luo, M. and Zhang, Y., 2019. Impact of megaproject governance on project performance: Dynamic governance of the Nanning transportation hub in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(3), p.05019002.

Lim, D.J. and Mukherjee, R., 2019. What Money Can’t Buy: The Security Externalities of Chinese Economic Statecraft in Post-War Sri Lanka. Asian Security, 15(2), pp.73-92.

Luo, L., He, Q., Jaselskis, E.J. and Xie, J., 2017. Construction project complexity: research trends and implications. Journal of construction engineering and management, 143(7), p.04017019.

Masood, E., 2019. SOUTH ASIA’S PIVOT TOWARDS CHINA.

Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. and Yang, J., 2015. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp.446-457.

Moramudali, U., 2016. Sri Lanka’s Debt and China’s Money. Image.

Nayanthara, P.G.N., Rosairo, K.D.A.R.P., Gunawardana, G.M.S.M., Sanjeewa, W.P.G., Dissanayake, D.M.D.O.K. and Vijitha, A.V.P., 2016. Identification of Most Suitable Locations for Rock Quarrying to Supply Aggregate Requirements of the Colombo Port City Development Project.

Patrick, A., 2017. China-Sri Lanka Strategic Hambantota Port Deal.

Ren, X., 2008. Architecture as branding: Mega project developments in Beijing. Built Environment, 34(4), pp.517-531.

Shah, A.R., 2019. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: The Way to the Modern Silk Road and the Perils of Overdependence. Asian Survey, 59(3), pp.407-428.

Siemiatycki, M., 2017. Cycles in megaproject development. The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, p.39.

Sonne-Schmidt, C., Arndt, C. and Magaua, M., 2009, April. Contribution of mega-projects to GPD in Mozambique. In IeSe conference Dinâmicas da Pobreza e Padrões de Acumulação económica (pp. 22-23).

Sultana, G., 2016. Sri Lanka after Rajapaksa: Can it Ignore China?. Strategic Analysis, 40(4), pp.245-254.

Thoradeniya, D.L. and Ranasinghe, M., 2018. The Colombo port city, its major issues and the road to successful implementation.

Tortajada, C. and Biswas, A.K., 2015. Sri Lanka, India and China: An Uncertain Triangle. Pragati–Indian National Interest.

Van Horen, B., 2002. City profile: Colombo. Cities, 19(3), pp.217-227.

Var, V. and Po, S., 2017, March. Cambodia, Sri Lanka and the China debt trap. In East Asia Forum (Vol. 18).

Wang, D., Fang, S. and Fu, H., 2019. The effectiveness of evolutionary governance in mega construction projects: a moderated mediation model of relational contract and transaction cost. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(4), pp.340-352.

Weerakoon, D. and Jayasuriya, S., 2019. Debt Financing for Development: The Sri Lankan Experience. In Managing Domestic and International Challenges and Opportunities in Post-conflict Development (pp. 95-112). Springer, Singapore.

Weerakoon, D. and Jayasuriya, S., 2019. Debt Financing for Development: The Sri Lankan Experience. In Managing Domestic and International Challenges and Opportunities in Post-conflict Development (pp. 95-112). Springer, Singapore.

Weerakoon, D., 2019. Building a Community of Common Destiny between China and its Neighbors: Challenges and the Future of Economic Cooperation in China–Sri Lanka Relations. China’s Belt And Road Initiative And Building The Community Of Common Destiny, 5, p.95.

Zhang, X., 2015, June. Exploration on Port-city Integration Development Mode under Regional Pattern–Take Spatial Development Planning of Wuhan Newport for Example. In International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT-15). Atlantis Press.

Zhou, H., Wang, H. and Zeng, W., 2018. Smart construction site in mega construction projects: a case study on island tunneling project of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. Front Eng Manag, 5(1), pp.78-87.