Summary

The relative impacts of normative and instrumental factors of policing on willingness to empower the police: A study from Jamaica

Under this Article, the need and the working of the citizens to follow the orders of the police are highlighted. The citizens in the Caribbean are quite willing to follow through with the orders of the police. It also talks about the impact that the instrumental and normative models relatively of policing have affected the willingness of people living in Jamaica to uplift the police. The research mentioned and as per the study, the need for process based model to be implemented in order to make policing better in the country is stated. Apart from this, the implications that policing as well as future research and policy making are being thoroughly discussed throughout the whole article (Pryce & Grant, 2019).

Institutional procedural justice and street procedural justice in Chinese policing: The mediating role of moral alignment

Under this article, the manner in which the external procedural justice system is dealt with is being compared with the internal procedural justice system as per the information that has been collected from the Chinese police officers. Despite the fact that the process based model has often put to test and has been researched upon so often, there is a very rare possibility of it being comparatively affecting at large specifically to the agency of the police. The fair supervision as well as treatment of the people in general, helped the build -up of trust amongst the officers as well as the public (Sun, Wu, Liu, & Van Craen, 2019).

Bibliography

Pryce, D. K., & Grant, L. (2019). The relative impacts of normative and instrumental factors of policing on willingness to empower the police: A study from Jamaica.  Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 18(1), 10-11.

Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., Liu, J., & Van Craen, M. (2019). Institutional procedural justice and street procedural justice in Chinese policing: The mediating role of moral alignment. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 52(2), 279-280.