Introduction
The article of John McDermott titled as “ How to have a conversation” is nothing but the writer’s journey who desired to investigate either the art of conversation can be taught in a properly formal setting or not. He joined a professional conversation class in order to become a great entertainer by the learnt skills. He realized after that the abstract ideas and the theories are the main focus of the class. However, it could not obscure the useful lessons he had learnt from the class regarding the purpose of conversation (Schneiderman, 2019). It is only through the use of the rhetorical devices that the author expressed himself effectively, vividly and interestingly. This paper will deal with the rhetorical analysis of John McDermott’s “ How to have a conversation”.
The Rhetorical devices
The writer relied on the metaphors evident in the entire article in order to facilitate the conceptualization of the ideas making his work effective and well understood. The Metaphors are on the other hand brilliant in capturing the emotional state of an experience (Artemas, Vos & Duffy, 2018). For the better understanding of their use, the literal language of McDermott can be compared and contrasted with other articles. In the article of McDermott, there is a portion where he says, “ none of my new friends said they wanted to be a raconteur in the Coleridge or the Hitchens mould “. He selected to use the metaphor “ in the Hitchens mould “ for capturing the quality being a fabulous conversationalist. He utilized Hitchens who is known in the world as an example of a great conversationalist instead of describing all the conditions of his subject matter.
He also makes good use of the metaphor “we were Boswells, not Johnsons”. He also tried his best to capture the well-meaning intentions and simplicity in one single word instead of a plethora of the phrases The metaphors have further enabled the conceptualization of the writer’s ideas through designing the work superiority. Taken for instance, the author also states that “ they faced a white wall that had been attacked by black paint, which had left behind a monochromatic mural”. It is where the writer sparks all his interest through the augmentation of the metaphorical language. It can be said that it could have been less appealing for them to say that their class room was having the black and white paint. Hence, it is pretty evident that the metaphors are useful in creating a better understanding of what the writer had first experienced.
In this particular article, the writer has used diction for sustaining the interest in the piece and at the same time enriching his own work. He used words such as “ raconteur “, “ raillery” that had better synonyms such as “amusing speaker” and “ jest “ respectively . The issue is that these words would not have incurred the same reaction as the choices of the author. The selections of the words have successfully created a positive attitude towards the writer from the readers as they give a proper impression of literary knowledge. Although these words are not used in the regular language , there are some of the readers who would become attracted by th words and apply in their language.
It is pretty sure that McDermott did not use the words meaninglessly or whimsically in the article. He must have found the words to be the most effective for the expression of his intentions. There are various synonyms of English which can be used to describe similar situations but these words also can be used to allude to different aspects. Taken for another instance, had the author desired to mock the American self help model, he would have addressed the Americans to be “pretentious “, “fraudulent” or “overeager”. In that place, he described them as “ charlatans peddling snake oil for the soul “.This particular description clearly suggests American self help groups to be teaching the skills which they do not have. It is undoubtedly a difficult skill to master over and a symbol of the writer’s accomplishments (Krippendorff, 2018). It would be difficult for the readers to understand the whole meaning of the article but they can enjoy the themes, the cadence of the language and the literary exhibition of words. The meaning can be concluded from the overall context and the unusual selection of words and it can be helpful in understanding the essay (Meredith, 2016). It is highly impressive to see the author’s choice of words because it renders the credibility to them and makes the overall work highly appealing.
The style of his sentence construction is different and sustains the interest of the story and further explains why a person should read till the end. The periodic sentences are visible in different parts of the article and it is done by the author for emphasizing on his subject matter and creating suspense in the work. It must also be noted that the periodic sentences have few predicates in the very beginning apart from the clauses in the end. This particular method is both ideal and climatic because it is always under analysis (Middleton et al., 2016). The author used the method for achieving the variety of sentence. This specific piece would have become monotonous if it stuck to the conventional construction of sentences.
In many parts, McDermott appears to be defying grammar and indicating that he has inter-mingled both the formal and the informal writings. Taken for instance, he begins a sentence with a preposition “And to have a bit of fun”. He has disregarded some traditional rules showing his own versatility (Schneiderman, 2019).
Conclusion
Hence, it can be said that the rhetorical devices in the entire article function as more than just the aesthetic reasons. The metaphors of McDermott have helped in the better understanding of work through making them relatable. These are the devices which prove that the article is full of creativity , vividness and clarity.
Bibliography
Artemas, K., Vos, T. P., & Duffy, M. (2018). Journalism hits a wall: Rhetorical construction of newspapers’ editorial and advertising relationship. Journalism Studies, 19(7), 1004-1020.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Meredith, J. (2016). Using conversation analysis and discursive psychology to analyse online data. Qualitative research, 261-276.
Middleton, M. K., Senda-Cook, S., Hess, A., & Endres, D. (2016). Contemplating the Participatory Turn in Rhetorical Criticism. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 16(6), 571-580.
Schneiderman, S. (2019). “How to Have a Conversation.” Retrieved from http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-to-have-conversation.html
