Introduction
The introduction of the basketball game through the women league and VCU has specifically aimed at empowering and encouraging female sports. The critical angle that is noticed in the sport was that the VCU led the game and thereby the report will discuss and elaborate the scores of the players and the manner in which it contributed to the overall performance of the team.
Significance of the game, player details and stats
The significance of the game is specifically reliant on the endeavor and the energy that the women players reflected through their performance. The aspects of women empowerment in the basketball sport might be considered as one of the critical factors that contributed to the significance of the game results. It has been noted through the scorecard that majority of the players of VCU like Robinson scored 17 points in the game. Other players like Archie and Hattix- Covingto have scored 9 and 8 respectively which specifically reflected the grandeur and energy of the sportsmen. The overall VCU team’s score dominated over the performance of George Mason which specifically indicates the performance of the women sportspersons in this area.
Participating teams
Nut graph
| # | Player | PTS | FG | 3FG | FT | OR | DR | REB | A | PF | TO | BL | ST | MIN | +/- |
| 1* | ROBINSON | 17 | 3-11 | 3-5 | 8-9 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 16 |
| 3* | HATTIX-COVINGTO | 8 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 10 |
| 22* | ARCHIE | 9 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 17 |
| 30* | HAMMOND | 6 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 27 | 10 |
| 34* | WILLIAMS | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 33 | 15 |
| 00 | TASSIN | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| 5 | PETROVA | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | -5 |
| 11 | MALASHKA | 2 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | -5 |
| 15 | PASHIGOREVA | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 |
| TM | TEAM | – | – | – | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTALS | 48 | 15-45 | 4-15 | 14-19 | 7 | 31 | 38 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 6 | 9 | |||
| GAME PCT | 33.3 | 26.7 | 73.7 | ||||||||||||
| THIS HALF | 21 | 4-22 | 1-7 | 12-15 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 7 | |||
| HALF PCT | 18.2 | 14.3 | 80.0 | ||||||||||||
| THIS QTR | 14 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 12-15 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| QTR PCT | 11.1 | 0.0 | 80.0 |
Conclusion
Therefore, from the above analysis it might be stated that the specific angle that can be noticed through the overall game stats that the VCU team of women basketball players has excelled in their performance which has created a valuable position of the same. The assessment of the scorecards specifically indicated the particulars of the winning team and the manner in which the operations might be judged in accordance with the common goals of empowering the women in the sports activities.
