Introduction:
COVID-19 is a global problem that needs experts, decision makers, and governments to discuss different aspects that go well beyond the nutrition and well-being ramifications of this pandemic (1). The article here calls for a re-focusing of study and policy not only to reduce these effects, but also to create continuity and increase resilience to potential recovery as the imminent health implications of the pandemic unfold and continue to be superseded by the influence of health promotion management initiatives. In 2018, 820 million people globally faced extreme hunger; from 113 million to 135 million (2) by 2019, many dealing with immediate, catastrophe-level food malnutrition had risen. By the end of 2020, COVID-19 will almost nearly twice amount to 265 million. The poor and middle class seem to be the most susceptible to the compounding effects of COVID-19 on the global food supply, including its implications for food development (planting and harvesting), shipping, manufacturing and healthy delivery to and from local markets (3). Protectionist policies by national governments and broken production chains could trigger shortages without international cooperation, raising prices internationally. The following paper defines and discusses the shape of the few countries described and provides alternate methods that may be used to assess infections with COVID-19 and death rates.
Discussion:
Construction of the graph:
Explanation of the graph with respect to different mentioned countries:
About 2.2 million new infections and 39,000 deaths from COVID-19 have been recorded in all six WHO regions during the last Weekly Epidemiological Update released on 5 October. This is the largest amount in a single week of confirmed cases so far (4). More than 37 million COVID-19 events and 1 million deaths have been recorded worldwide from 30 December through 11 October. Almost half of these cases (48%) and casualties (55%) appear to be recorded in the area. The Americas accounted for the highest number of new cases and fatalities in the area, with the United States of America, Brazil and Argentina. In the WHO region, the European Region recorded the highest rise (34%) in cases during the past week, whilst the African Region recorded a substantial increase in the number of fatalities, with a 27% increase relative to the previous week. South Africa tends to record more than half of all recorded verified cases within the African Region (56 percent, 690 896) (4). The South-East Asia Area recorded a decrease in new incidence and mortality of 6 percent and 8 percent, respectively, for the third week in a row, relative to the previous week. In the combined table, the countries to be addressed are the USA, Brazil, Sweden and Australia. About 800 000 new cases have been identified in the Area of the Americas over the previous seven days, a rise of 6 percent in the amount of new issues over the past week, which is a greater increase than the increase reported in the previous week. A shift that is larger than the week before. The largest number of freshly recorded cases is documented in the United States of America, Brazil , Argentina, Mexico and Colombia. The area still appears to blame for the bulk of all casualties recorded worldwide in the past week (n= 20 500, 52%) (4). The largest thousands of current fatalities is recorded in Mexico, the United States of America, Brazil , Argentina and Colombia. The United States of America recorded the highest rise in freshly reported cases since early August this past week, with over 327 000 reported cases. The largest one-day rises in cases is recorded by ten of the 50 states. Since their first recorded occurrence, including those in the Midwest and Southwest, their fastest growing-ever one-day rise in new deaths has been recorded by three states. After mid-July, patterns of occurrence have stayed steadily higher for those aged 20 to 39 years than for all other age classes. A growing trend in the regular amount of hospitalised cases between the ages of 20 and 39 has been reported since mid-September. With the continent’s second-highest occurrence of percent of the total number people, Costa Rica currently has more than 86 000 cases and more than 1 000 deaths. The nation has hit a peak with similar numbers of confirmed cases and deaths over the last 5 weeks. Over 107 COVID-19 hospitalizations per million inhabitants have been registered by the government, of which over a third are in intensive care units. On March 11, 2020, the first coronavirus-related death case (COVID-19) in Sweden was identified. Since then, the number of fatalities has risen to 5,922 in general. As of October 19, 2020, the number of individuals who were or had been reported afflicted by the virus in the world had achieved a total of 106,380 (7). Brazil was the nation with the largest number of reported COVID-19 cases in Latin America as of October 15, 2020, with over 5.16 million occurrences. By state, with much more than 1.05 million events, São Paulo placed first (6).
On June 6, the Brazilian government started reporting the country’s accumulated number of cases and fatalities, as well as the state breakdown, and removed the past that had been written. The graph displays, for Australia, the total number of freshly reported cases of COVID-19 by the date of notification issued. The bottom axis indicates the reporting date and the overall accumulated number of COVID-19 instances is displayed on the vertical axis. The first COVID-19 cases were found in Australia in late January (5). In March, the number of new cases gradually rose and peaked. There has also been a sustained and comparatively low variety of emerging cases registered daily since mid-April. Modelling is a valuable method for trying to prepare for missing events, such as those that are minor events that are possibly missing in modern monitoring operations, and the time gap between onset and death (8). The Infection Fatality Ratio can be measured using an average amount of cumulative infections. A safe, educated, skilled, equipped, secure, well-managed, and properly staffed multi-disciplinary health care workforce is needed to provide the diagnosis, medication, and vaccine therapies for COVID-19, while retaining critical health services. Salaried and voluntary health and social care staff pose several obstacles related to COVID-19, contributing to either an expanded workload or workplace absences.
Limitations observed:
Challenges to be faced in the situation reports include as such previously established deficiencies of the working population; repurposing of workers to the COVID-19 response; illnesses and deaths; provisions for isolation and body-isolation; pressure and emotional exhaustion; limitations of essential equipment and materials, such as personal protective equipment (PPE); insufficient training; labor strikes; and caring for friends and relatives contaminated (9). To accurately qualify the effect, a thorough evaluation of the effect of COVID-19 on health and social care staff could use consistent metrics and monitoring. There are globally agreed metrics and they are part of the current WHO tracking and collaboration practises. Health and social staff are at a greater risk of contamination than the general public while in touch with patients with COVID-19 and/or who care for patients with COVID-19. It is necessary to minimise and reduce this risk, and to obey WHO guidelines. Using Case Report Forms (CRFs), WHO gathers case-based surveillance data from Member States through WHO global surveillance for COVID-19 (10). The CRF database held 8,233,444 types as of 14 September 2020, comprising 28.4 percent of the cases registered globally by that point. A descriptive review of illnesses, hospitalizations, clinical findings, and sub-population review (such as profession identified as a health worker) is facilitated by the CRFs (11). On 281 083 HWs out of 1 932 941 CRFs that suggested HW1 status (23.5 percent of all CRFs) from 83 countries, a study of health worker (HW) details was performed. These statistics, mainly covering European and American countries, estimate that about 14% of the WHO registered cases of COVID-19 are classified as originating in medical personnel (11). In the estimated proportion of HW affected between countries, there are large variations. The overall estimated estimation of HW infections indicates a strong affirmative action of outbreaks, since they constitute less than 3 % of the population worldwide and less than 8% on estimated in high-income countries. Appreciatively, the statistics show that since the height of the outbreak, there has been a noticeable decrease in HW infection, independently of the overall shift in the rate of cases. This is likely to be attributed to the organization’s services of PPE in many countries and stronger adherence to the protocols for infection prevention and control (IPC) (12).
Conclusion:
In order to create an effective public health approach to any epidemic pathogen, it is important to provide knowledge and evaluate the mechanisms of spread, disease incidence, and the effects of control and mitigation steps. In Computational mathematics and technical analysis are useful methods that can be used to predict key propagation and severity parameters, in addition to descriptive analysis of available epidemiological and clinical evidence. Acting with an international network of statisticians and statistical modellers, Which has been calculating main epidemiological parameters of COVID-19, such as the incubation duration (time between diagnosis and initiation of symptoms), the event fatality ratio (CFR, the proportion of cases which die), the diagnosis fatality ratio (IFR, the proportion of all affected patients who die), and the serial interval (time to death).
References:
1.Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, Ballard C, Christensen H, Silver RC, Everall I, Ford T. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15. doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
2.Lambert H, Gupte J, Fletcher H, Hammond L, Lowe N, Pelling M, Raina N, Shahid T, Shanks K. COVID-19 as a global challenge: towards an inclusive and sustainable future. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2020 Aug 1;4(8):e312-4.
3.Mishra A, Bruno E, Zilberman D. Compound natural and human disasters: Managing drought and COVID-19 to sustain global agriculture and food sectors. Science of The Total Environment. 2020 Sep 4;754:142210.
4.Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [Internet]. Who.int. 2020 [cited 22 October 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20201012-weekly-epi-update-9.pdf
5.Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 cases [Internet]. www.health.gov.au/resources/cumulative-confirmed-covid-19-cases-by-notification-date. 2020 [cited 22 October 2020]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/cumulative-confirmed-covid-19-cases-by-notification-date
6.Prata DN, Rodrigues W, Bermejo PH. Temperature significantly changes COVID-19 transmission in (sub) tropical cities of Brazil. Science of the Total Environment. 2020 Apr 25:138862.
7.Hensvik L, Skans O. COVID-19 Crisis Response Monitoring: Sweden.
8.Alamo T, Reina DG, Millán P. Data-driven methods to monitor, model, forecast and control covid-19 pandemic: Leveraging data science, epidemiology and control theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.01731. 2020 Jun 1.
9.Moon MJ. Fighting Against COVID‐19 with Agility, Transparency, and Participation: Wicked Policy Problems and New Governance Challenges. Public Administration Review. 2020 Jan 1.
10.World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19).
11.World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 ( COVID-19): situation report, 103.
Houghton C, Meskell P, Delaney H, Smalle M, Glenton C, Booth A, Chan XH, Devane D, Biesty LM. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020(4).
