Question No. 1
Calculation of Tax Rates | ||
Amount in US Dollars | ||
Particulars | 2018 | 2019 |
(a) Income tax expenses | 3,380 | 3,673 |
(b) Earnings before tax | 15,242 | 16,996 |
Tax rate (a/b) | 22.18% | 21.61% |
Calculation of OPAT | ||
Amount in US Dollars | ||
Particulars | 2018 | 2019 |
Operating Income | 19,007 | 21,125 |
Less: Tax expenses | 4,216 | 4,565 |
Operating Profit After Tax (OPAT) | 14,791.25 | 16,559.89 |
Calculation of Cost of Invested Capital | ||
Amount in US Dollars | ||
Particulars | 2018 | 2019 |
(a) Invested Capital (assumed total assets) | 251684 | 263414 |
(b) WACC | 7% | 7% |
Cost of Invested Capital (a×b) | 17617.88 | 18438.98 |
Calculation of EVA | ||
Amount in US Dollars | ||
Particulars | 2018 | 2019 |
Operating Profit After Tax | 14,791.25 | 16,559.89 |
Less: Cost of Invested Capital | 17617.88 | 18438.98 |
Economic Value Added | (2,826.63) | (1,879.09) |
Question no 2
2.1) this statement is false because company reduce their investment or increases their investment in business when the needs arise. The reduction on the investment amount is not a one-time effect.
2.2) as it can be seen that in 2019 the company has issue long term debt of $5479 while in 2018 the issued amount was $44781. So it can be rightly said that the given statement is incorrect
2.3) the statement is correct that the company has returned a maximum amount to their shareholders by repurchasing their common stock and also by paying huge amount of dividend.
Question no 3
Accounts payable is a short term obligation which has to be paid by the company to its suppliers or creditors. It is the sum of amounts which is owed to all the suppliers and vendors for the services and goods supplied by them. When the account payable of a business increases it means that the business is purchasing high quantity of goods from its vendors on credit and the amount will be paid by the firm on further period. Thus the amount of the goods which has been taken on credit is not blocked and can be utilized in some other essential purpose. (Footnote 1)
Question No. 4
Calculation of Net Present Value | |||||
Amount in dollars | |||||
Particulars | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Operating profit before depreciation | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
Less: Depreciation | 225 | 225 | 225 | 225 | |
Operating profit after depreciation | 275 | 275 | 275 | 275 | |
Less: Tax @21% | 58 | 58 | 58 | 58 | |
Operating profit after tax | 217 | 217 | 217 | 217 | |
Add: Depreciation | 225 | 225 | 225 | 225 | |
Cash inflow after tax | 442 | 442 | 442 | 442 | |
Present value factor @8% | 0.926 | 0.857 | 0.794 | 0.735 | |
Present value of cash inflows | 409.49 | 379.16 | 351.07 | 325.07 | |
Present value of cash inflows (Total) | 1,464.79 | ||||
Less: Cost of machine after tax | 711.00 | ||||
Net Present Value | 753.79 |
Question No. 5
Initial investment | 35000 | |
Cash inflow per annum | 3000 | |
Discounting rate | 8% | |
Cash flow growth rate | 3% | |
Calculation of Present Value of the Perpetuity | ||
Particulars | Amount | |
(a) Cash inflow per annum | 3000 | |
(b) Divided by Discount rate minus Cash flow growth rate | 5% | |
Discounting rate | 8% | |
Cash flow growth rate | 3% | |
Present Value of Perpetuity (a/b) | 60000 | |
Calculation of Net Present Value | ||
Particulars | Amount | |
Present Value of Perpetuity | 60000 | |
Less: Initial Investment | 35000 | |
NPV | 25000 | |
Calculation of Rate of Return | ||
Particulars | Amount | |
(a) Cash inflow per annum | 3000 | |
(b) Initial investment | 35000 | |
Rate of Return (a/b) | 8.57% |
Question No. 6
Particulars | Amount in millions of US dollars | Weights |
Total Debt | 111,989.00 | 38% |
Market Value of equity | 184,079.20 | 62% |
Total Capital for WACC calculation | 296,068.20 | 100% |
Tax rate | 21% |
Cost of debt | 4% |
Cost of debt after tax [4(1-0.21)] | 3.16% |
Calculation of Market Return | |
Book value of common equity | 82,726.00 |
Market capitalization | 184,079.20 |
Market Return | 101,353.20 |
Market Return in % | 123% |
Period in years (assumed as government bonds) | 30 |
Average Market Return | 4.08% |
Calculation of Cost of Equity | |
Return from 30 Years Government Bond (Rf) | 2% |
Average Market Return (Rm) | 4.08% |
Market Risk Premium (Rm-Rf) | 2.08% |
Beta (β) | 0.9 |
Cost of Equity [Rf + β(Rm-Rf)] | 3.87% |
Particulars | Cost (in %) | Weighted | Weighted Cost |
Debt | 3.16 | 38% | 1.20 |
Equity | 3.87 | 62% | 2.40 |
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (in%) | 3.60 |
Question No. 7
Calculation of NPV | ||||
Amount in million dollars | ||||
Year | Annual Profit | Discounting Factor @6% | Present Value of Cash Inflows | |
1 | 300 | 1.06 | 0.9434 | 283.02 |
2 | 300 | 1.1236 | 0.8900 | 267.00 |
3 | 300 | 1.19102 | 0.8396 | 251.89 |
4 | 300 | 1.26248 | 0.7921 | 237.63 |
5 | 300 | 1.33823 | 0.7473 | 224.18 |
6 | 300 | 1.41852 | 0.7050 | 211.49 |
7 | 300 | 1.50363 | 0.6651 | 199.52 |
8 | 300 | 1.59385 | 0.6274 | 188.22 |
9 | 300 | 1.68948 | 0.5919 | 177.57 |
10 | 325 | 1.79085 | 0.5584 | 181.48 |
Present value of cash inflows | 2221.99 | |||
Less: Investment cost | 1100.00 | |||
Less: Research and Development cost | 40.00 | |||
Net Present Value | 1081.99 | |||
Calculation of NPV | ||||
If after 3 years the research is successful then | ||||
Probability of Success = 5% | ||||
Particulars | Amount in million dollars | |||
Present value of cash inflows | 1,865.62 | |||
Less: Investment cost | 1,100.00 | |||
Less: Research and Development cost | 40.00 | |||
Net Present Value | 725.62 | |||
Calculation of NPV | ||||
If after 3 years the research is unsuccessful then | ||||
Probability of failure = 95% | ||||
Particulars | Amount in million dollars | |||
Present value of cash inflows | – | |||
Less: Research and Development cost | 40.00 | |||
Net Present Value | (40.00) | |||
Calculation of Expected NPV | ||||
Particulars | Amount in million dollars | |||
NPV of successful research (725.2×5%) | 36.28 | |||
NPV of unsuccessful research (40×95%) | (38.00) | |||
Expected NPV | (1.72) |
Question no 8
There are many sources of financing but most often the company uses equity and debenture. The company can raise its capital by issuing debenture or by issuing equity. The CFO wants the company to issue equity shares and not to issue debenture because if the firm issue equity shares then there are certain benefits of issuing equity shares to the company such as the equity shareholders will not demand dividends whenever the organization declares dividend. At the time of liquidation equity shareholders will be paid after paying debenture holders, preferential creditors, and preference shareholders.
If the interest rate of debenture is high then the company should not issue debenture because the debenture holders will be paid interest at a higher rate which will create liability for the company and also at the time of winding up debenture holders are the one who will demand their redemption and interest amount before equity shareholders. Thus the CFO is correct that the company should use equity as a financing source rather than debenture. (Footnote 2)
Question no 9
When a company issue new shares the number of shares increases but the stock price of the shares remain constant. There is no relationship between issuing new shares the share price. But by issuing additional shares the ownership of the existing shareholders diluted or reduces. New shares can affect the existing shareholders shares value. So to increase the value of existing holders company often buyback their shares form the market.
Question no 10
There are many benefits of issuing bonds rather than taking bank loans such as while taking bank loans the end-use has to be mentioned but in case of bond no need to specify any end-use to the bondholders by the firm. Even if the bank interest rate of borrowing the loan amount is less but the company should prefer bonds because the bond interest rate is always less than the bank rate.
This difference interest rate can assist the organization in generating maximum profit. If a firm issue bond then large numbers of lenders can be attracted to the company. The benefit of flexibility can be achieved by issuing a wide variety of debt or bonds. Another advantage is that bond carries liquidity that is investors can sell their bonds anytime in the financial institutions, banks and also to other qualified buyers. Bank loans are considered to be illiquid. (Footnote 3)
Question no. 11
- The US retailer can enter into forward contract to prevent the loss due to fluctuation in economy
- Interest rate swap strategy should be used by the importer to hedge against the volatility of interest rate.
- The manufacturing firm of US can apply the strategy of forward contracts, swaps, and options.
- CFO can use the strategy of arbitrage so that he can earn profit when the price of steel decreases
- The currency fluctuation can also be hedged by using currency swaps, options, and forward contracts. (Footnote 4)
Question no 12
- Acquisition price that will be paid by the acquirer to the target company will be the total enterprise value that is $ 293088.2.
- If the acquisition deal is wholly paid on cash then the debt amount that the acquirer will have to take is $2875882 ($293088.2 subtracted by cash balance of $5500)
c) This deal can be financed by private equity enterprise by raising funds from issuing variety of debt so that the acquisition can be completed.
d) Yes an LBO deal would be profitable in this case as all the funds will be raised by debt.
Question No. 13
Calculation of Premium (in pounds) | |
to be paid by Kraft | |
Particulars | Amount |
Price offered by Kraft per share (in pound) | 7.45 |
No. of shares outstanding (in millions) | 1,370.00 |
Amount to be paid by Kraft to Cadbury (in million pounds) (A) | 10,206.50 |
Price per share of Cadbury (in pounds) | 5.71 |
No. of shares outstanding (in millions) | 1,370.00 |
Market Value of Cadbury (in million pounds) (B) | 7,822.70 |
Premium offered by Kraft (in million pounds) (A-B) | 2,383.80 |
Calculation of Premium (in dollars) | |
to be paid by Kraft | |
Particulars | Amount |
(a) Market Value of Cadbury (in million dollars) | 12,830.00 |
(b) Market Value of Cadbury (in million pounds) | 7,822.70 |
Exchange Rate per dollars (a/b) | 1.64 |
(a) Premium offered by Kraft (in million pounds) | 2,383.80 |
(b) Exchange Rate per dollars | 1.64 |
Premium offered by Kraft (in million dollars) (a×b) | 3,909.67 |
Calculation of Value of Synergy (in dollars) | |
estimated by the Analyst | |
Particulars | Amount |
Annual cost savings | 475.00 |
Less: Tax @30% | 142.50 |
Annual cost savings after tax | 332.50 |
Divided by Discount rate minus Growth rate (10%-2%) | 8% |
Present Value of Annual cost savings (A) | 4,156.25 |
Integration cost | 1,500.00 |
Present value factor @10% for 1 year | 0.909 |
Present Value of Integration cost (B) | 1,363.50 |
Value of Synergy (A-B) | 2,792.75 |
Comparison of Premium paid by Kraft & Value of Synergy | |
Particulars | Amount |
Premium offered by Kraft | 3,909.67 |
Less: Value of Synergy | 2,792.75 |
Extra Premium | 1,116.92 |