Overall point of argument
ATC privatization would help various countries to scale up a good number of their operations and ensure that multiple goals are met in real time without any barrier being encountered. Moreover, the privatization will also speed up the implementation of the next generation. Interestingly, the argument uses quite some approaches to capture the attention of the audience regarding the privatization of ATC.
Claims and assumptions
Claim#1: The methods that are implemented by this mode of reasoning are well structured, clear and also don’t contain any complications at all.
Assumptions: It starts by pinpointing some of the essential issues related to ATC privatization and how various people together with organizations have been able to handle these issues. The argument goes further to indicate how involving it is to work on multiple aspects that are related to ATC privatization to come up with the desired outcome
Claim#2: The information that the argument presents is unique and has got the capability of talking about some of the essential areas where other cases usually find it difficult to speak of (Annarelli & Nonino, 2016).
Assumptions: It goes further to use quite a number of questions to refer to various conditions and at the same time it also carries a comparison of multiple organizations in terms of their mode of operations, where, the argument itself fully supports the actions made by private organizations since they tend to perform better than quite a number of government agencies. This type of comparison brings on board a clear understanding of what is taking place within the organizations.
Claim#3: The argument consists of quite some elements that clearly show what is entailed within the boundaries of ATC privatization.
Assumptions: One good thing about the case is that it starts by talking about one fundamental question that tries to bring a comparison between a private organization and a public agency. Moreover, this is a question that tends to capture the attention of the audience by trying to bring on board some comparison condition regarding which organization is more efficient than the other.
Claim#4: Quite some airlines have been able to come on board were a good number of them are supporting the implementation of privatization.
Assumptions: This is as a result of the positive outcome that is being experienced from various issues that are within the boundaries of privatization.
Claim 5: The case gives an illustration that even except delta airlines; the entire airline industry still supports various aspects that are related to ATC privatization.
Assumptions: This support is intended to bring the desired outcome within the stipulated time frame.
Moreover, quite some issues have been received regarding the ability to carry out an introduction of the ATC reforms under various reasonable conditions. The argument itself values all the benefits that are likely to be brought about by issues dealing with ATC privatization, and due to this, there are quite some positive points of view pertaining various situations that are brought on board as a result of the privatization.
Evidence and support
Evidence and support for claim#1: It also links the privatization with the top management officials of quite some senior management officials of various organizations clearly illustrating their reactions on how these issues are handled under any circumstances. The argument goes further to postulate that a private organization would develop the capability of scaling up its capital thus taking the analysis to be the next level for a given individual to understand what is taking place. This is an argument that has quite some strengths attached to it. It is because of all its strengths that any person who reads through the argument can understand what is taking place under various circumstances. First and for most, it presents nearly all the points in a clear and precise manner thus avoiding any controversies that are likely to emerge. The argument that is presented in the paper that talks about uncertain funding levels together with several other challenges to illustrate why the changes to the ATC system are slow, has been used to illustrate a certain negative condition that is capable of taking place.
Evidence and support for claim#2: Technology is a parameter that has been implemented within the argument where its condition is said to be obsolete before its introduction is carried out since all the effort of FAA appears to be encountering some barrier related condition as a result of political activities (Seiden & Johnson, 2017). The argument goes on to carry out some connection between quite some airlines and privatization by making it clear that airlines are in favor of the known privatization. Moreover, there are some conditions for interest that the argument displays as far as airlines for America are concerned.
Evidence and support for claim#3: The argument uses this condition to point out how the airlines have been on the forefront to fight for privatization together with the ability to introduce quite some ATC reforms at a more reasonable rate (Rattikin, 2017). On the other hand, the argument tries to point out how various organizations have also been supporting ATC privatization. This has been clearly shown at the point where the National Air Traffic Association has been able to come on board to support the privatization (Putnam, Clabbers & Osit, 2017).
Evidence and support for claim#4: According to the argument, there are some conditions that have also been brought on board regarding the entire situation where NATCA welcomes the ATC privatization so long as it doesn’t cause any impact to most of the existing work protections, healthcare benefits together with the pay levels of various personalities (Gond, Cabantous, Harding & Learmonth, 2016). At the same time, this argument tries to connect ATC privatization with what is taking place at the international platform by measuring its effectiveness about how various countries can view it. According to the argument, countries like Canada, the United Kingdom, and even Germany have been able to highlight some of the benefits that they have received from matters about privatization. It further supports the situation with solid evidence on how various proponents including the airlines have been able to gain interest in implementing a system that is almost the same as the one operating within the boundaries if Canada. This is a technique that the argument uses to clearly show how various interests are likely to emerge most so when issues about privatization are brought into consideration (Barry & Wilkinson, 2016). Another strength that is connected to this argument is that it also highlights some of the benefits that are likely to be obtained from the implementation of various aspects of privatization. It, therefore, uses the next generation as an example to this kind of situation where it clearly states that the next generation represents the efforts adopted by the FAA in terms of modernizing the entire infrastructure that is associated with the national aerospace. Moreover, the argument moves to the other side and brings on board the point of view of various personalities clearly represented by the office of the inspector general who despite all the efforts brought on board by FAA, went ahead to document a report that postulated that FAA lacks a reasonably developed kind of framework that would help them to manage the overall oversight attached to the coming generation. Within the argument, the nature of the transition has also been talked about where it has been regarded as a condition that is taking too long and at the same time appears to be too expensive than what is expected of it (Forsberg, 2016).
Evidence
and support for claim#5: A
comparison has been used to compare the transition and a private contractor who
appears to have the latitude and all the other resources required to carry out
the duty within a short period and in an efficient manner. According to the
argument, nearly all the benefits that are brought on board as a result of ATC
privatization are much clear and can easily be understood without any
conditions of controversies or even contradictions (Sturges,
Conway, Guest & Liefooghe, 2015). Additionally,
it talks about the condition of the United States in terms of hoe it enjoys the
existing privileges associated with the safest air transportation system not
only at the regional level but at the international level. According to the
argument, it further raises some question that in as much as there is an
increase in the national airspace system in terms of its congestion together
with its complexity, for how long wills the entire ATC system be able to
maintain the current safety conditions that are related to aviation safety?
This is a crucial question that the argument uses to capture the attention of
the audience and expose the audience to a condition of thinking about the
situation beyond the boundaries to attain the intended outcome (Lee, Shiue & Chen, 2016).
Additionally, the argument highly values a privatized ATC system and strongly
backs it up with solid evidence by clearly stating that it is a system that
would appear to be highly responsive to all the needs of a particular type of
user (Greenberg, 2016).
Besides, the argument also believes that any privatized ATC system, possess
quite some financial resources that are required to bring on board quite some
changes (Bolen, 2017).
The whole argument tends to present some weakness that is attached to it. At
some point, it conducts a comparison of various situations but doesn’t provide
enough analysis aimed towards expanding more on a given situation (Bormann & Rowold, 2016). Moreover, the
argument tries to focus on serious elements of ATC privatization and where it
connects the privatization to quite some organizations and personalities. About
all the points that are displayed by the whole argument, its analysis major
revolves around providing adequate and reliable information that are well
documented and easy to understand (Scott, 2017). This situation has given it an added advantage to fully
develop its strengths for people to be able to understand what is going on.
Moreover, the argument also tries to be diverse since it talks about quite some
events that tend to take place both at the local, regional and even at the
international level. Interestingly, it does this by clearly presenting the
point of view of various personalities together with organizations (de Almeida, Weigang, Meinerz & Li, 2016).
Also, the entire argument tries to be different from the rest of arguments
since it places much focus in implementing ethical considerations in all the
presented points of view to create boundaries and bring a clear understanding
of what is taking place. The ability of
national traffic controllers association to support ATC privatization clearly
shows the relationship that exists, and The argument, therefore, puts it clear
that people are ready to implement the changes that are likely to occur as a
result of bringing on board a good number of issues that are related to ATC
privatization.
Conclusion
ATC privation appears to have quite a number of benefits associated with it; many organizations together with their respective stakeholders have been able to benefit from various aspects involving ATC privatization. Moreover, its implementation involves quite a number of issues that are being carried out in an adequate and reliable manner in order to come up with the desired outcome. ATC privatization has gained popularity across many organizations most so the ones who have developed the potential of adequately implementing it in a reasonable manner. Senior management teams of each and every organization should be ready to implement various strategies that are required most so when dealing with this kind of privatization.
Adequate and reliable ethical considerations during its implementation will ensure that appropriate outcome is met in real time. One good thing about this ATC privatization is that it fully supports the way a given organization carries out its operations thus bringing on board some form of understanding between the top management team and the senior officials of a given organization. It is capable of adequately offering a clear description of what a given organization is capable of doing under various circumstances. For this mode of privatization to be implemented in an appropriate manner, quite a number of procedures need to be followed without making any assumptions. Normally, those organizations that have been able to fully support issues associated with ATC privatization, have been able to ensure that the entire process doesn’t interfere with most of their rules and regulations at any given point. This further provides an adequate and reliable opportunity to carry out various operations without encountering any form of barrier related issues.
References
Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational
resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1-18.
Bolen, E. (2017). АТС Privatization Is Unconstitutional. The Air and Space Lawyer, 30(2).
Bormann, K. C., & Rowold, J. (2016). Ethical leadership’s potential and boundaries in
organizational change: A moderated mediation model of employee silence. German
Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(3-4), 225-245.
Barry, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Pro‐social or pro‐management? A critique of the conception
of employee voice as a pro‐social behaviour within organizational behaviour. British
Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(2), 261-284.
de Almeida, C. R., Weigang, L., Meinerz, G. V., & Li, L. (2016). Satisficing Game Approach to
Collaborative Decision Making Including Airport Management. IEEE Transactions on
Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(8), 2262-2271.
Forsberg, R. (2016). Conditions affecting safety on the Swedish railway–Train drivers’
experiences and perceptions. Safety science, 85, 53-59.
Gond, J. P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by
performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of
Greenberg, J. (2016). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of
management, 16(2), 399-432.
Lee, J. C., Shiue, Y. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2016). Examining the impacts of organizational culture
and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process
improvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 462-474.
Putnam, J. E., Clabbers, N. M., & Osit, S. L. (2017). The View from the Ground: Airport and
Community Perspectives on АТС Reform. The Air and Space Lawyer, 30(2).
Rattikin, L. (2017). Air Traffic Control in the United States: Is Privatization the Path Back to the
Top. J. Air L. & Com., 82, 651.
Seiden, S. J., & Johnson, K. B. (2017). Integration through Separation: Why an ATC Split Could
Be a Hit for Drones. The Air and Space Lawyer, 30(4), 4-8.
Scott, P. F. (2017). Authority to Carry in the United Kingdom: The Right to Travel, the
Privatization of Security and the Rule of Law. European Public Law, 23(4), 787-810.
performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440-463.
Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., & Liefooghe, A. (2015). Managing the career deal: The
psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management,
organizational commitment and work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior:
The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational
Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 821-838.
