TASK –
. define/ provide explanation of value capture
.coordinated business models in networks
. value appropriation through control of digital industry architecture
=> Definition – The value capture has been for the public financing which is able to set the public infrastructure based on the generation of the private landowners. There have been public investments which are important to generate the land values with the focus on the increased profit in the private sectors which capture all the positive externalists.
=> The value capture has been including the types of land value, tax increment, certain financial assets or the infrastructure impact fees with a joint development, extraction or other interests.
=> PHASE 1 & PHASE 2 – PHASE 1
The providing of a feasible value of the innovation system. there have been applications which are completely scattered and unfocused to take hold of the intellectual property system setup. the advancement of the new lands and establishment is based on the new innovation with the development of sources and the distribution channels.
The value capture has been including the types of land value, tax increment, certain financial assets or the infrastructure impact fees with a joint development, extraction or other interests.
=> PHASE 2
The defining of the game rules In this, the firm is able to handle the work with the realisation of all the values which are important to trap the profits along with information system depending upon the royalty deals. There are innovation, value, alignment, infrastructure, cost based dependency.
Phase 2: This stage is completely innovation based which is able to hold all the procedures and the policies depending upon the control of the advances infrastructure.
=> Phase 3 – VALUE MAXIMISATION
The major focus has been on the technology with a proper development of the business and economic models. This phase never ends as it is completely focusing on the value proportions with proper business and the economic model growth.
The major strategy has been to take care of the innovation with the shifting of the customer needs as well as determining the growth of the business.
The drive to the innovation setup is based on sharing of the information from the different players who have been able to hold the market value chains along with dealing with all the suppliers and the customers. There have been innovation in the power of micro processing with information to hold the fast free technology.
Co-ordinated business models in networks
=> Definition – These are the back to the front structure which is able to handle the earlier instantiation of the model based on the value chain.
=> The collaborative network is having a major impact on solving the problems which are facing the peer-to-peer structure. The coordinated business network is based on the scaling and the maturity with a proper volume operation and transactions. There has been an efficiency based on the contracts to accept commoditization.
The coordinated network has been to set the market with the complex systems along with the challenge on the outsourcing of the competitive differentiation. There are examples of the same like: advertisement, consumer electronics, media and the entertainment, telecommunications and the airlines.
Coordinated Networking – The company are focusing on the network which is able to support the multiple routes as well as offering the moves from the different raw materials to deliver a complete offer
The coordinated network is based on a higher volume pattern which is completely transactional to hold the competitive advantage. There has been a major demand of the retail and the supply chain management for handling all the online media sites with the airlines and other discount breakage.
Business model – The coordinated network is able to hold the outsourcing oriented economy.
There have been a business network which is completely imperative to hold the programs and the projects depending upon the market involvement. The major focus has been to handle the transformation of the network which can easily gain the competitive network advantage.
value appropriation through control of digital industry architecture –
=> Definition – There has been a major development in the organisational performance with the ability to properly develop the collection of the routines which are important for a proper strategy by leveraging the digital assets, as per the creation of a differential value. There have been IT sources where the resources are able to combine and form a system depending upon the capabilities and growth.
The value creation has been concerning the IT organisation which integrates the enabled innovation with the focus on mobile communication as well as the performance of the functional systems. there are IT roles of the organisational changes and performances which hover on the study of the information system.
Digital Industry – There has been the major ability to hold the distributed resources with the repetitive and recognizable patterns which are able to implement the input flows.
The value appropriation is based on the operational platforms which is for the firms towards the generativist and profitability. There has been a greater sharing revenue which models the mobile ecosystem thereby handling the shared model contribution towards the mobile service success.
=> Arguments – There has been an advancement in the IT which hovers on the social contexts as well as defining the IT innovation with the changing organisational structures.
=> A proper fusion of the IT is based on taking care of the linked strategies with practicing all the important things which affect the scale, scope, speed and dimension.
There has been a greater generation of the digital capability which is able to involve all the actions which are based on the business model development, products and services. the adaption to the IT change transforms and involve the routines of the digital assets as well as organising the logics and the structure.
Reference
=> Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1-15.
=> Codd, E. F. (1979). Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 4(4), 397-434.
=> Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship.
=> Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
=> Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44.
