Organizational Behavior assignment essay help: Herzberg’s Motivation Theory

 Motivation is an inner drive which impels action. If we see historically, different researchers have been explaining different types of motivational theories. Organizations have been implementing the motivational theories to cope with the challenges like new technologies, demographic changes, downsizing, Globalization and for rewarding the employees. Organizations have to retain the employees by motivating them by using different variables (Managementstudyguide.com.  2012). The renowned motivational theories are known as  need hierarchy theory by Maslow’s, Goal setting theory by Locke, ERG theory by Alderfer’s, McClelland power theory and Fredrick Herzberg’s two factor theory. Motivation is being linked with organizational success because it provides stability to the employees, satisfaction towards the job is being increased, goals can be achieved easily, increases efficiency and develops friendly relationship. It increases the products, process and the systems for the organizational development. Motivation was used in past and it is still reliable factor at present. It will help to empower the employees and they have autonomy to work as pert their own choice. Companies can develop a competitive edge over others by motivating their employees. In the given research paper the Herzberg’s Motivation theory of power has been explained. In 1959, Herzberg’s founded the two factor theory. The factors are known as the Motivating and the hygiene factors. Hygiene factor is linked with the extrinsic factor known as company policy, working conditions, supervision, security of Job, status and supervision at the workplace. These factors are being provided to the employees to remove their dissatisfaction. The factors related to the motivation are known as intrinsic factor such as achievement, responsibility, and the challenging work. The Herzberg’s research theory had a connection with the motivation theory (Alan Chapman     2003). The theory is also known as the dual factor theory. Many researchers had criticized the work of Herzberg’s because they said that money cannot be used by the organizations to motivate the employees at their workplace. Organization growth has been linked with motivational factor. Employees get motivation and they perform better by increasing their efficiency. Human psychology has been linked with motivational factor and their attitudes at their workplace. It will help to reflect the behavior of the people and their performance at workplace.  It has been observed that employee’s feel empowered when they are being rewarded with social and the monetary aspects in an organization.

As per the given research paper employee’s empowerment is linked with the motivational factor and with their performance at the workplace. This theory also faced the weakness such as inappropriate pays at workplace can hamper the performance of the employees and also it could be presented in a form of Continuum where the employees feel that they are experiencing a neutral state. Two views were highlighted when the research was conducted based on the factor of motivation. It was identified by Taylor that employees are very lazy and to motivate them external factor is required. The next view was highlighted by Hawthorn who stated that employees want to be self motivated because they have a desire to get the social and monetary benefits which is an internal requirement. Division of motivation is also done on the basis of process and the context theories. Organization growth is only possible if there is power and it comes with empowerment process of the employees. Fredrick Herzberg’s described the content theory by linking it with the internal and the external factor. The process theory has been linked with the Vroom’s expectancy theory (Iowa State University   2009).The employee’s behavior was related with the motivational aspect from 1970’s. The social learning of the employees was related with the reinforcement process and with motivation. The leadership theories are well interconnected with the motivational factor because the employees get inspiration from their leaders and get motivated. The rewards system or the performance management system can be linked with the motivational factor. In 1980’s, the literature review of different articles was related with motivation has been empowering the employees in a team. Different organization can be stated where the employees have been using their power negatively and the corporate scandals have taken place. It has created a negative image globally for the organization along with their leaders. It was resulted with the movement and motivation failure within the hierarchical level and within the boardrooms. The locus of control should be maintained to use the power properly within an organization to achieve a positive result. The research paper data was collected properly with the help of Interview and critical incidence method to provide emphasis on the Herzberg’s motivation theory. The two clusters response was fragmented into two parts known as dissatisfaction and the satisfaction factors. Many of the researchers responded that Herzberg’s motivating theory was a big failure. They also responded that money cannot be used to motivate every time for the employees. It was a bounded theory to explain the motivational factor. In 1986, Herzberg’s wanted to clarify his views and therefore he published an article which was known as One More Time. It was published to show the distinction between the movement and motivation process. The article was published by Harvard Business Review and was sold with maximum volume in different countries across the globe. Movement explains the factors which avoid pain and problems that occur in an environment internally and externally Training & Development Solutions    2012). Motivation is known as an inner battery to charge human. Employees also can enrich their job and it will provide motivation to them.  The research was conducted by him on 1987 at different countries to show the gap between motivation and movement (NetMBA.com    2012). He explained that the growing need of human can only be satisfied with the help of motivation. It was also linked with the suggestion scheme. The four points interrelated with suggestion schemes and is described in this paragraph. It was explained in such manner that employees want their ideas which are suggested to be implemented, the satisfaction of this thing should be immediately shown, organization should not be perceived just for making money, and employees can contribute for the organizational success. The stability of employees depends upon the effective HR system which can be developed by the well interaction of the employees. The sectors where the research was conducted included Retail, Government, manufacturing, utilities, and etc. The list included 32 companies with total number of 5000 questionnaires of which 3209 response was being received. The questionnaire included what is the importance of the employee’s idea, why it should be contributed and factors like age, gender, duration of service, of the employees. The points also included the relationship of employees with their senior management and managers (Mind Tools Ltd   2012).The data was analyzed by using the SPSS software. Multiple numbers of the responses were supporting to an idea and problem was identified in classification of motivation and movement. The problems at workplace like inapproachability, in supportiveness, and lack of knowledge will not contribute to an idea. The employees contributing ideas is supporting the top management positively. It was a failure because every time organizations cannot use the financial method to motivate it. The main thing was that, whether Herzberg’s theory supporting the idea contribution for an organization. The points like in appropriate skill, more number of employee’s turnover, and lower motivation impacted the overall organizational performance (Journal of Management Development   2005). These factors showed the difference because many times the power is misused in an organization for achieving its success.

Therefore the paper draws a conclusion that motivational theory is linked with human, psychological and economic aspects. Herzberg’s used it to show that organizations using their power properly will help to grow their employees and it globally. Different types of power used in an organization are such as reward, coercive, legitimate, rewards and referent power. Power can be used to enrich the job and to increase the productivity of the employees. It can be used to remove the negative factors like frustration, anxiety and selfishness (About.com   2012). The will be better growing options for the employees in their career. Motivation will provide the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards. It can be concluded that the Herzberg’s motivation theory is valid and relevant in today’s time who want to grow globally. The employees can only perform better when some motivational factor is linked with their performance. Employees will desire to give their best with positive result in an appropriate period of time. The managers and the employees find suitable to increase the efficiency and relate it with the rewards and compensation of their employees (Training & Development Solutions     2012). The factors like dissatisfaction and satisfaction can be removed while performing the jobs by the employees at the workplace. It can be used for the job enlargement and the enrichment process. The hygiene and motivating factors plays a vital role for an organization to develop their employees and make the best use of resources. Thus this theory can stay with power in an Organization by motivating their employees. 

If you want OB Management Assignment Help study samples to help you write professional custom essay’s and essay writing help.

Receive assured help from our talented and expert writers! Did you buy assignment and assignment writing services from our experts in a very affordable price.

To get more information, please contact us or visit www.myassignmenthelp.Com