THEORETICAL REVIEW

A detailed discussion on different theories and their importance in governance of corporate entities will be covered in this document. Imparting useful knowledge on the subject of corporate governance by discussing on different theories and financial performance of corporations is the main objective of the entire document.

2.1.1 AGENCY THEORY

Agency theory is a rule that is utilized to clarify and resolve issues in the connection between business administrators and their representatives. Most regularly, that relationship is the one between investors, as administrators, and business executives, as specialists.

An office, in expansive terms, is any connection between two gatherings where one, the specialist, speaks to the next, the head, in everyday exchanges. The head or directors have employed the specialist to play out assistance for their sake (Sama-Lang and Zesung, 2016).

Administrators delegate dynamic position to specialists. Since numerous choices that influence the chief monetarily are made by the specialist, contrasts of feeling, and even contrasts in needs and interests, can emerge. Office hypothesis expects that the interests of a head and a specialist are not generally in arrangement. This is at times alluded to as the head specialist issue (Naciti, 2019).

By definition, a specialist is utilizing the assets of a head. The chief has depended cash yet has almost no everyday information. The specialist is the leader however is causing almost no danger in light of the fact that any misfortunes will be borne by the head (Schillemans and Bjurstrøm, 2019).

Monetary organizers and portfolio administrators are specialists for their directors and are given obligation regarding the chiefs’ resources. A resident might be responsible for securing and shielding resources that don’t have a place with them. Despite the fact that the renter is entrusted with the employment of dealing with the resources, the resident has less interest in securing the merchandise than the real proprietors.

The head specialist issue happens when the interests of a head and specialist clash. Organizations should try to limit these circumstances through strong corporate strategy. These contentions present regularly moral people with open doors for moral danger. Motivations might be utilized to divert the conduct of the specialist to realign these interests with the chief’s interests (Freudenreich et al. 2020).

Agency theory tends to debates that emerge basically in two key zones: A distinction in objectives or a distinction in hazard avoidance.

For instance, organization heads may choose to extend a business into new business sectors. This will forfeit the transient benefit of the organization in the desire for development and higher profit later on. In any case, investors may put a need on momentary capital development and restrict the organization choice (Kyere and Ausloos, 2020).

Corporate administration can be utilized to change the principles under which the specialist works and reestablish the chief’s advantages. The head, by utilizing the specialist to speak to the chief’s advantages, must beat an absence of data about the specialist’s exhibition of the undertaking. Specialists must have motivations urging them to act as one with the chief’s advantages. Organization hypothesis might be utilized to plan these impetuses suitably by thinking about what interests persuade the specialist to act. Motivators empowering some unacceptable conduct must be taken out, and leads debilitating good peril must be set up. Understanding the instruments that make issues assists organizations with growing better corporate approach (Dias et al. 2017).

To decide if a specialist demonstrations in their chief’s wellbeing, the norm of “office misfortune” has arisen as a usually utilized measurement. Carefully characterized, organization misfortune is the contrast between the ideal outcomes for the head and the results of the specialist’s conduct. For instance, when a specialist regularly performs in light of the chief’s wellbeing, office misfortune is zero. In any case, the further a specialist’s activities separate from the chief’s eventual benefits, the more prominent the office misfortune becomes (Zuva and Zuva, 2018).

Another focal issue frequently tended to by office hypothesis includes incongruent degrees of danger resilience between a head and a specialist. For instance, investors in a bank may protest that administration has set the bar too low on credit endorsements, along these lines facing too extraordinary a challenge of defaults (Zuva and Zuva, 2018).

This investigation offers bits of knowledge to administrators about how characteristic motivations may give an elective component of authority over agent’s behavior to extraneous motivators endorsed by conventional organization hypothesis. In reality, inborn motivators of individual fulfillment and recognizable proof with hierarchical articles, joined with verifiable social commitments and correspondence may, in specific situations, give more grounded restrictions on specialist advantage than the utilization of conventional outward compensations as impetus arrangement.

2.1.2 STEWARDSHIP THEORY

Stewardship hypothesis is a structure which contends that individuals are characteristically roused to work for other people or for associations to achieve the errands and duties with which they have been endowed. It contends that individuals are aggregate leaning and favorable to authoritative instead of individualistic and in this way run after the fulfillment of hierarchical, gathering, or cultural objectives on the grounds that doing so gives them a more elevated level of fulfillment. Stewardship hypothesis in this manner gives one system to portraying the inspirations of administrative conduct in different kinds of associations (Kultys, 2016).

Stewardship hypothesis of corporate administration is a regulating option in contrast to office hypothesis. This article contends that the stewardship conduct of administrators brings about excellent corporate administration rehearses when the embraced estimations of the firm are lined up with the established qualities (Theodoulidis et al. 2017)). The contextual analysis strategy is utilized to demonstrate this contention by examining corporate administration rehearses in a family-possessed business bunch in India. The Murugappa Group is a 100-year-old family-possessed business gathering, known for their moral practices and at present oversaw by the fourth-age relatives, without going through any split. The upheld also instituted estimations of the gathering are examined and corporate administration practices of the gathering firms broke down in this article. The article centers on the administration structure of the gathering, its progression arranging rehearses and the possession structure. The investigation demonstrates that adjusting the instituted qualities to the upheld esteem helped the gathering to adjust to the changing outside monetary climate and keep making investor esteem, the pith of corporate administration (Chrisman, 2019).

A steward is characterized as somebody who secures and deals with the requirements of others. Under the stewardship hypothesis, organization heads ensure the interests of the proprietors or investors and settle on choices for their sake. Their sole target is to make and keep up a fruitful association so the investors succeed. Firms that grasp stewardship place the CEO and Chairman duties under one chief, with a board included generally of in-house members. This takes into account private information on authoritative activity and a profound promise to progress (Madhani, 2017).

It is useful to balance it with two other mainstream administration styles. The office hypothesis centers on a governing rules kind of administration. The CEO and Chairman of the Board are two particular substances. The top managerial staff, which is included generally autonomous individuals, is entrusted with checking the executives to stay away from issues. The partner hypothesis analyzes the requirements of investors as well as of each group related with the association – including workers, providers and colleagues – and nobody bunch is a higher priority than the other (Keay, 2017).

It doesn’t have a solid scriptural basis; no place in humankind expressly gives the function of creation to stewards. It is an egotistical ethic, recommending that people have both the privilege and the capacity to put together creation, and that nature is in an ideal situation when overseen by us.

2.1.3 STAKEHOLDER THEORY

Stakeholder hypothesis holds that an organization’s partners incorporate pretty much anybody influenced by the organization and its operations. That view is contrary to the since quite a while ago held investor hypothesis proposed by financial specialist Milton Friedman that in private enterprise, the main partners an organization should think about are its investors – and along these lines, its primary concern. Friedman’s view is that organizations are constrained to make a benefit, to fulfill their investors, and to proceed with positive development (Subramanian, 2018).

Conversely, Dr. Freeman proposes that an organization’s partners are “those gatherings without whose help the association would stop to exist.” These gatherings would incorporate clients, representatives, providers, political activity gatherings, natural gatherings, nearby networks, the media, monetary foundations, administrative gatherings, and the sky is the limit from there. This view paints the professional workplace as an environment of related gatherings, all of whom require be thinking of and fulfilling to stay with the sound and fruitful in the long-term (Madhani, 2017).

Partner hypothesis depends on the supposition that organizations must be viewed as effective when they convey an incentive to most of their partners.

That implies that benefit alone can’t be viewed as the main proportion of business achievement. How about we investigate a portion of the regular partners for a run of the mill business:

Investors: No issue here – regardless of partner hypothesis being situated as the direct opposite of investor hypothesis, actually investors (or yourself in the event that you own the business) will consistently be probably the greatest partner you are dependable to. They are thusly totally with regards to the way of thinking of partner hypothesis (Adeabah et al. 2019).

Workers and employees: Another easy decision, even the most harsh money manager will concur that upbeat workers is something worth being thankful for.

Clients: Clients are another undeniable partner to consider in the eco-arrangement of your business.

Networks: One can characterize network in a wide range of ways, from neighborhood to virtual. In any case, they are a vital participant in partner hypothesis (Chepkwei, 2020).

Companions and Family: This may appear to be a little odd; however your own loved ones (just as those of your workers) are likewise basic partners to fulfill under partner hypothesis.

Customers: Presently things are getting somewhat strange – for what reason would you need to fulfill the requirements of your rivals? Well partner hypothesis proposes that a solid serious climate benefits everybody, including different partners, for example, clients (Wakaisuka-Isingoma et al. 2016).

Most pundits feel that the hypothesis is vacuous and offers an unreasonable perspective on how associations work. In this view, the association is a shell that can be composed upon openly by the different gatherings that make a case for the organization. The firm has not many natural interests.

2.1.4 RESOURCE DEPENDENCY THEORY

Resource Dependency Theory (RDT) is worried about how hierarchical conduct is influenced by outside assets the association uses, for example, crude materials. The hypothesis is significant on the grounds that an association’s capacity to assemble, change and endeavor crude materials quicker than contenders can be central to progress (Sarens and Merendino, 2016).

A few reporters urge associations to see clients as an asset inclined to shortage.

The hypothesis began during the 1970s with the distribution of The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective by Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald R. Salancik.

RDT is supported by the possibility that assets are critical to authoritative achievement and that entrance and command over assets is a premise of intensity. Assets are frequently constrained by associations not in the control of the association requiring them, implying that systems must be deliberately viewed as to keep up open admittance to assets (Duppati et al. 2019).

The hypothesis depends on the rule that an association, for example, a business firm, must take part in exchanges with different entertainers and associations in its current circumstance to gain assets. Albeit such exchanges might be invaluable, they may likewise make conditions that are most certainly not.

2.2 MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS OF GOVERNANCE

Working a business in the present society is progressively mind boggling and brimming with chances. Administration is a combination of strategies, frameworks, and structures, alongside a vital, operational system that adjusts hierarchical authority to make a move, so they can settle on viable choices with responsibility. A model for administration alludes to how those strategies, frameworks, structures, and system interface with one another and whether the duty regarding them lies with the board overall, or with the individual board individuals (Zogning, 2017).

Board administration models for not-for-profit and revenue driven associations are as various as the associations that sheets serve. Philanthropic associations for the most part start up to serve a compassionate or natural need. Revenue driven organizations create pay for the organization, its representatives, and its investors (Amis et al. 2020). While many board administration models can be utilized for one or the other not-for-profit or revenue driven substances, contingent on the requirements of the association, particular sorts of models might be amiable to not-for-profit associations, while different models are more suitable for revenue driven associations. It’s regular for a board to embrace a mix of board administration models that takes into account the component of the association and the piece of the board (Brennan et al. 2019).

Governance models for non-profit organizations:

Board Governance Model: A CEO who establishes an association will before long find that he needs assistance in running the association. A board fills in as the essential asset for the CEO to turn for help and exhortation. Individuals from a board are confided in guides who offer proficient aptitudes and gifts at no expense to the association (Rae et al. 2017). Working sheets may likewise be framed notwithstanding an association’s board to help and prompt the board, in general. Board individuals regularly have set up mastery or qualifications in the not-for-profit’s field. An association that is obviously associated with a warning board’s name, can build the association’s validity, gathering pledges endeavours, or public connection endeavours (Vargas-Hernández and Teodoro Cruz, 2018).

Supporter Governance Model: The Patron Model is like the Advisory Board Model. The principle contrast between the two models is that the basic role of the board individuals under the Patron Model is to perform obligations identified with raising money. Benefactor Model sheets are regularly involved board individuals who have individual abundance or impact inside the field. The essential function of board individuals under the Patron Model is to contribute their own assets to the association and to utilize their organization to increase outside commitments for the association. Under this model, the board individuals have less impact over the CEO or association’s board than in the Advisory Board Model (Avcın and Balcıoğlu, 2017).

Helpful Governance Model: A board that works without a CEO utilizes a Cooperative Model. The board settles on consensual choices as a gathering of companions, making it the most just administration model. There is no pecking order and nobody individual has control over another. The board exists simply because the law requires its arrangement. This model necessitates that every part be similarly dedicated to the association and ready to make duty regarding the moves of the entire board (Mohammed and Muhammed, 2017).

Supervisory group Model: The most well known administration model for not-for-profit associations is the Management Team Model. This model is like how an association oversees its obligations. As opposed to recruiting paid representatives to be answerable for HR, raising money, account, arranging, and projects, the board structures advisory groups to play out those obligations (Savedoff and Smith, 2016).

Strategy Board Model: John Carver, creator of “Sheets that Make a Difference,” built up the Policy Board Model, which immediately turned into a staple stage for philanthropies. The board gives a significant level of trust and certainty over to the CEO. The board has standard gatherings with the CEO to get refreshes on the association’s exercises. Under this model, there are not many standing boards. Board individuals ought to have an exhibited promise to the association and be eager to fill in the information and capacities with respect to the association (Robinson, 2020).

Numerous not-for-profit associations will embrace one primary model, for example, Carver’s Policy Board Model, and add at least one sheet to balance the necessities of the association. For instance, a wellbeing association may frame a warning board to prompt them and a foundation board to deal with gathering pledges. Strict associations work under unexpected guidelines in comparison to other non-benefits. Holy places, confidence missions, and different strict associations may add a strict board, with the goal that they might be better stewards of their association’s resources (Kultys, 2016).

Corporate governance models:

Conventional Model: The Traditional Model is the most established model for corporate administration. It’s somewhat obsolete by the present guidelines; however it incorporates a valuable layout that keeps on being utilized for setting up articles of consolidation. The Traditional Model gives lawful obligation to the aggregate board and the board talks as one voice on all issues. The model recognizes the structures; however the board plots the cycles as expressed in the ordinances (Garfin et al. 2016).

Carver Board Governance Model: As noted in the part on philanthropic models, the Carver Model works for charitable and revenue driven associations. The Carver Model places its emphasis on the “closes” of the association’s motivation. This implies the association effectively runs after what it needs to accomplish or what it needs to do to make itself bankrupt. Inside characterized limit, the board gives the CEO the majority of the obligation regarding utilizing the way to get to the closures (Shi et al. 2017).

Agreement Board Governance Model: The Consensus, or Process Model, is a type of the Cooperative Model that philanthropic associations use. It gives all board individuals an equivalent vote, equivalent obligation, and equivalent risk. The Consensus Model is fitting for companies without significant investors (Trebitz and Wulfhorst, 2020).

Competency Board Governance Model: A corporate board that is keen on building up the information and abilities of the board individuals will profit by the Competency Model, a model that centres on correspondence, trust, and connections to improve generally speaking board execution. The association’s local laws accomplish crafted by sketching out practices and techniques (Mohamad Yusof, 2016).

While many board administration models can be utilized for one or the other charitable or revenue driven substances, contingent on the requirements of the association, specific kinds of models might be manageable to not-for-profit associations, while different models are more agreeable to revenue driven associations. It’s normal for sheets to embrace a blend of board administration models that take into account the highlights of the association and the synthesis of the board (Leorke and Wyatt, 2019).

2.3 MEASURING GOVERNANCE – KEY INDICATORS AND METRICS

Key indicators and metrics to measure corporate governance are discussed below.

Customary key execution markers are apparently one of the main control apparatuses to stay with an on target. The shrewd figures give the premise to drift setting choices and furthermore show the immediate connection between costs, deals and friends benefit. Notwithstanding, digitalization requires a reexamine in customary execution the board. All things considered, how would you measure advancements and by what method can information about reach and perceivability be definitively incorporated into the current administration framework and related announcing? This new and frequently obscure zone requires totally unique key figures, which are otherwise called Digital Transformation KPIs (Paniagua et al. 2019).

Computerized Transformation KPIs as a triumph factor for corporate administration:  

With the assistance of Digital Transformation KPIs, it is conceivable to sum up the advanced achievement of an organization in figures. Rather than customary key figures, the Digital Transformation KPIs center on importance in each estimation that straightforwardly impacts the objective technique. This importance can be gotten and surveyed from various measurements. The real exhibition estimation can be done through own inward stages just as by means of existing outside gateways (Braune et al. 2020). For instance, IT goliaths, for example, Google, Facebook and Amazon effectively offer their clients significant dashboards with normalized measurements that permit significant decisions about the organization’s computerized execution the board. Despite the stage picked, in any case, it is significant that the measurements are incorporated into the worth chain all through the organization and are constantly dissected and assessed in direct association with existing key figures (Garcia and Orsato, 2020).

To quantify pertinence, it is important to record and evaluate the conduct changes of the clients. For instance, it is conceivable to assess click rates or list items by means of Google Analytics or different stages. The individuals who work numerous computerized channels have the choice to total the information of the various channels on an inside stage and incorporate it into the current dashboard. For instance, both client conduct and consumer loyalty can be estimated and assessed homogeneously previously, during and after a web based promoting effort. In contrast to conventional measurements, Digital Transformation KPIs empower improvements to be performed a lot quicker, permitting the organization to adjust its advanced contribution and goals all the more rapidly to changing economic situations.

Advanced Transformation KPIs as an objective technique and control apparatus which key figures are quite compelling throughout the advanced change, each organization needs to choose for itself. Subsequently, the inner advancement of digitalization just as the business, the goal and the item range impact the need and the weighting of the individual key figures. Lately, nonetheless, singular key figures have arisen as standard measurements for less difficult similarity, which implies that most outside stages measure them.

1. Active visitor clicking percentage
2. Discussion Rate
3. Ricochet rate
4. Length of remain
5. Return rate

For the objective setting just as the administration framework, it is likewise intriguing to relate various measurements to one another. For instance, the connection between guests who visit the site just a single time and clients who return consistently is a decent marker of the adequacy and allure of the site. What’s more, quantitative and subjective signs ought not to be absent in any dashboard. For instance, it is significant for the executives to have information on the number of remarks, likes and offers singular posts create, and the connection among positive and negative surveys likewise permits significant ends to be drawn about the presentation the board and nature of the computerized business.

Nimbleness and improvement as a corporate system:

The fundamental essential for any successful presentation the executives is the normal assessment of the current information. The advanced specialty unit offers the favorable position that the essential key figures are continually accessible continuously. For greatest productivity, the key figures should be assessed at a foreordained mood, whereby it is useful to watch out for the key figures, particularly previously, during and after the setting of various measures. Moreover, normal correlations with the figures from past periods likewise help to effectively decide operational objectives and improve them if essential. This methodology shapes a solid establishment on which future choices can be established.

2.4 MEASURING FINACIAL PERFORMANCE

In order to measure the financial performance of business as well as non-business organizations it is essential to review the complete set of financial statements prepared by these organizations. The complete set of financial statements for corporate and business organizations include profit and loss statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement, statement of changes in equity and notes to accounts. For non-profit organizations the complete set of financial statements includes statement of income and expenditures, balance sheet and cash flow statement. In order to measure the financial performance for any organization it is important to evaluate the financial statements of the organization. The financial statements whether it is a corporate entity or non-corporate entity must be prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting and accounting standards to correctly reflect the financial performance of the concerned entity in the financial statements. The most important and useful part of the entire set of financial statements to the evaluation of financial performance of an entity is the profit and loss statement or statement of financial performance. Profit and loss statement is prepared to record the amount of revenue earned and received during a particular financial year and the expenditures incurred to generate such revenue. The amount of profit or loss incurred from the operations of the entity is determined and stated in the profit and loss statement of and entity. Hence, to measure the financial performance of an entity is absolutely compulsory to evaluate and assess the profit and loss statement of the entity. Further comparative analysis of financial performance by using the financial statements of an organization for last three or five years will be helpful in analyzing the growth of an organization or lack of it over the last three or five years respectively. Apart from that the comparative analysis by comparing the profit and loss statement of an organization with the profit and loss statement of its peers will enable the management of the concerned organization to take important and useful decisions to improve the performance of the organization.    

 2.5 THE LINK BETWEEN GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

There is direct and close link between governance and financial performance of corporate entities as well as non-corporate entities. The financial performance of an entity is primarily dependant on the governance of the entity. The governance of entities in case of corporate entities is the responsibility of the board of directors and in case of non-corporate entities it is the domain of similar authority within those entities. The board of directors or other similar authorities with different names appoints managers to govern organizations with the objective of ensuring optimum utilization of organization resources to achieve the desired objectives of the concerned organizations. The financial performance of an organization whether good or bad will mostly depend on the governance of the organization, i.e. if the management and board of directors of an organization take correct decisions to govern the organization effectively then the financial performance of the organization will also be quite good. Contrastingly an organization having inexperienced management may not be governed properly and this will obviously affect its financial performance negatively. The governance is about taking important decisions in relation to the management of an entity such as allocation of resources, projects in which investments have to be made, recruitment of employees & staffs and assigning different positions within the organizations to the employees & staffs recruited and other managerial decisions. Thus, the governance is directly and closely related to the financial performance of an organization.    

2.6 FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF POOR GOVERNANCE

As already discussed in the previous section of the document that the governance of an organization directly affects its financial performance of the organization hence, it is obvious that poor governance with have adverse consequences on the financial performance of an organization. Governance of an organization is about taking important decisions in relation to the management of the affairs and operations within the organization starting from allocation of resources to segregating responsibilities and duties within the organization. Error and mismanagement of an organization due to poor governance will render inefficient resource allocation, wastage and misuse of resources, improper recruitment strategy of employees and staffs as well as improper and incorrect segregation of duties and responsibilities. All these will have negative impact on the financial performance of the organization. In fact the financial consequences of poor governance could be extremely serious for an organization as continuous poor governance without any improvement could finally lead to winding up of an organization.   

2.7 EMPIRICAL REVIEW

Management of an organization in the modern day and age under cut throat competition is one of the most difficult and challenging tasks for the managers of the organization. It is important for the managers to have complete and in-depth knowledge about different theories as discussed in the beginning of the document to help them to deal with different situations and circumstances while managing the affairs of an organization. It is not enough for the managers to have theoretical knowledge only but it is equally important for them to have the ability to practically implement the theories in practice my using the knowledge gained in theories to manage the affairs of the organizations. From agency theory to stakeholder theory; from stewardship theory to resource dependence theory it is important for the managers to gather significant knowledge to properly govern business organizations. The financial performance on the basis of which the success and failure of an organization is measured is dependent on the governance of the organization hence; the management must be aware of different theories to utilize them in the management of the organizations to achieve greater financial performance. The empirical review clearly showed that the financial performance of business entities is assessed and evaluated by appraising the financial statements of the entities. The importance of preparation and presentation of financial statements of entities must be done in accordance with the applicable financial reporting standards to ensure that these statements correctly reflect the financial performance of the entities.         

2.8 RESEARCH GAPS

The research gaps are referred to as the lack of information or missing information that raise significant doubt about the conclusion reached in a particular research. Thus, the ability to conclude a research is limited due to the research gaps. Hence; it is important to take all necessary steps and precautions to minimize the research gap. The lower research gaps are the greater would be the significance of the research findings and conclusions reached. All the efforts shall be made at the time of conducting a research to ensure that all necessary facts and information are collected to get to the depth of the topic on which the research is based.       

2.9 CONCLUSION

Taking into consideration the discussion here it is safe to state that the corporate governance and management to a large extent is dependent on the knowledge and ability of the managers to implement the theories they have learned in actual practice while taking important management and governance related decisions. A detailed discussion here showed the importance of different theories in corporate governance and how the governance is closely related to the financial performance of organizations. Thus, managers are advised to undertake necessary trainings to not only gather necessary knowledge about managing the affairs of business and non-business organizations but also to equip them with the ability to practically implement this knowledge while taking important and useful business decisions. Emphasis shall be placed both on theoretical knowledge and practical implementation of this knowledge in running and managing the affairs of organizations.         

References: 

Adeabah, D., Gyeke-Dako, A. and Andoh, C., 2019. Board gender diversity, corporate governance and bank efficiency in Ghana: a two stage data envelope analysis (DEA) approach. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

Amis, J., Barney, J., Mahoney, J.T. and Wang, H., 2020. From the Editors—Why We Need a Theory of Stakeholder Governance—And Why This is a Hard Problem. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), pp.499-503.

Avcın, M. and Balcıoğlu, H., 2017. Corporate governance: A model of modern corporate governance framework for the better governance of companies. In Modern Organisational Governance. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E.W. and Davis, P.E., 2016. Agency theory: background and epistemology. Journal of Management History.

Braune, E., Sahut, J.M. and Teulon, F., 2020. Intangible capital, governance and financial performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, p.119934.

Brennan, N.M., Subramaniam, N. and van Staden, C.J., 2019. Corporate governance implications of disruptive technology: An overview.

Chepkwei, A.K., 2020. Implementation of Corporate Governance Strategy: An Overview of Africa. In A Multidimensional Economic Assessment of Africa (pp. 199-215). Springer, Singapore.

Chrisman, J.J., 2019. Stewardship theory: Realism, relevance, and family firm governance.

Dias, A., Lima Rodrigues, L. and Craig, R., 2017. Corporate governance effects on social responsibility disclosures.

Duppati, G.R., Scrimgeour, F. and Sune, A., 2019. Relevance of corporate boards in driving performance in the period that covers financial crisis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F. and Schaltegger, S., 2020. A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), pp.3-18.

Garcia, A.S. and Orsato, R.J., 2020. Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment.

Garfin, G.M., Scott, C.A., Wilder, M., Varady, R.G. and Merideth, R., 2016. Metrics for assessing adaptive capacity and water security: common challenges, diverging contexts, emerging consensus. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 21, pp.86-89.

Keay, A., 2017. Stewardship theory: is board accountability necessary?. International Journal of Law and Management.

Kultys, J., 2016. Controversies about agency theory as theoretical basis for corporate governance. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4), pp.613-634.

Kultys, J., 2016. Controversies about agency theory as theoretical basis for corporate governance. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4), pp.613-634.

Kyere, M. and Ausloos, M., 2020. Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics.

Leorke, D. and Wyatt, D., 2019. Metrics, Metrocentricity, and Governance Models: The Uneven Transformation of Libraries. In Public Libraries in the Smart City (pp. 95-116). Palgrave Pivot, Singapore.

Madhani, P.M., 2017. Diverse roles of corporate board: Review of various corporate governance theories. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 16(2), pp.7-28.

Madhani, P.M., 2017. Diverse roles of corporate board: Review of various corporate governance theories. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 16(2), pp.7-28.

Mohamad Yusof, N.Z., 2016. Context matters: a critique of agency theory in corporate governance research in emerging countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S7), pp.154-158.

Mohammed, S.A.S.A.N. and Muhammed, J., 2017. The relationship between agency theory, stakeholder theory and Shariah supervisory board in Islamic banking. Humanomics.

Naciti, V., 2019. Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, p.117727.

Paniagua, J., Rivelles, R. and Sapena, J., 2018. Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89, pp.229-234.

Rae, K., Sands, J. and Subramaniam, N., 2017. Associations among the five components within COSO internal control-integrated framework as the underpinning of quality corporate governance. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), pp.28-54.

Robinson, C., 2020. Measuring ‘Well-Governed’Migration: The IOM’s Migration Governance Indicators. In The International Organization for Migration (pp. 123-143). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Sama-Lang, I. and Zesung, N.A., 2016. The stakeholder theory of corporate control and the place of ethics in OHADA: The case of Cameroon. African Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1).

Sarens, G. and Merendino, A., 2016. Multiple agency theory in corporate governance: an alternative lens to study independent directors (No. UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain). Working Paper Series, Louvain School of Management Research Institute.

Savedoff, W.D. and Smith, P.C., 2016. Measuring governance: accountability, management and research. Strengthening Health System Governance, p.85.

Schillemans, T. and Bjurstrøm, K.H., 2019. Trust and verification: balancing agency and stewardship theory in the governance of agencies. International Public Management Journal, pp.1-35.

Shi, W., Connelly, B.L. and Hoskisson, R.E., 2017. External corporate governance and financial fraud: Cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), pp.1268-1286.

Subramanian, S., 2018. Stewardship theory of corporate governance and value system: The case of a family-owned business group in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(1), pp.88-102.

Theodoulidis, B., Diaz, D., Crotto, F. and Rancati, E., 2017. Exploring corporate social responsibility and financial performance through stakeholder theory in the tourism industries. Tourism Management, 62, pp.173-188.

Trebitz, K.I. and Wulfhorst, J.D., 2020. Relating social networks, ecological health, and reservoir basin governance. River Research and Applications.

Vargas-Hernández, J.G. and Teodoro Cruz, M.E., 2018. Corporate governance and agency theory: Megacable case. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 1 (2), pp.59-69.

Wakaisuka-Isingoma, J., Aduda, J., Wainaina, G. and Mwangi, C.I., 2016. Corporate governance, firm characteristics, external environment and performance of financial institutions in Uganda: A review of literature. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), p.1261526.

Zogning, F., 2017. Agency theory: A critical review. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), pp.1-8.

Zuva, J. and Zuva, T., 2018. Corporate governance and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 10(1), pp.16-29.

Zuva, J. and Zuva, T., 2018. Corporate governance and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 10(1), pp.16-29.