Answer of question 1:
| Half duplex | Full duplex | |
| Pros | The implementation process is significantly simpler than the full duplexThe network is comparatively less congestedThere is minimal complex hardware required (Kreutz et al., 2014)Only antenna could work as the transmitter as well as the receiverSpeed of half duplex is slightly highCost of implementation is significantly less than the full duplex | Complete data capacity is accessible in each of the direction as the functions of send and receive have been separated.It provides significantly low latency as the functions of transmit and receive operates continuously and simultaneouslyIt could be used in the license exempt and licensed bands.Majority of the licensed bands are FDD Speed of full duplex circuit is the major advantage |
| Cons | Data could be transmitted in both the directions on the signal carrier but not at the similar timeThe responsiveness of the half duplex circuit is the major disadvantageThe future growth of half duplex circuit is not considered to be positive | Installation process is significantly complex. Any provided path needs the complete availability of the pair of frequenciesCost of full duplex circuit is significantly high |
Answer of question 2:
| Point-to-point | Multipoint | |
| Pros | Dedicated to use of two computersSignificantly fast as compared to any other network topologies as it could access only two nodesSimple connectivityOffers significantly low latencyEasy to maintain and handleEach computer comprises of their own circuit executing itself to other computers | Many computers connected in single circuitCost is significantly lowEach computer shares the circuit with any otherMore than 2 devices could share communication link (FitzGerald, Dennis and Durcikova, 2014)Reduces the amount of the cable requiredLow cabling cost as well as installation cost |
| Cons | Utilisation of this kind of connection is used for the small areas where the nodes has been closely relatedComplete network relies on mutual channel in the case of any link broken, the complete network would be hampered (FitzGerald, Dennis and Durcikova, 2014)Transfer of data could be done across the network | Installation process is significantly complex.Only one computer could utilise circuit at any time |
Answer of question 3:
| CAT 5 | Fiber | Wifi | |
| Pros | Still remains as one of the cheapest options for the networking cableCat 5 offers high transfer speedsCapable of transferring four signals at onceIt has the advantage of significant versatility | Bandwidth of fiber optic cables is significantly high than the metal cablesPower loss in the optical fibers is significantly less than the counterpartsImmune to Interference Capacity is significantly high than the other cablesSecurity is high for the optical fibres and it provides secured modes of transmission (Xia et al., 2014) | Convenience is significantly highMobility is gained with the installation of wifi in the organisationsProductivity could be increased immenselyResponsiveness of wireless network is significantly high |
| Cons | There is a limitation on how much data could be transmitted using the Cat 5 cablesNot effective for long range communicationsSignificantly sensitive to the interference | Significantly difficult to spliceCostly to installIncreasingly susceptibleFlexibility of the cables is significantly low and it does not allow the proper transmission of data within the curves | Security is the major issue of wifi connectionRange of wifi network is significantly low than the wired connection |
Answer of question 4:
Some of the precautions that could be taken for securing the transmission and reduce the transmission errors are increasing the signal strength, shield the wires, and increase the guardbands. The option that is available other than the UTP cat 5 is the fibre optical cable. Any fiber optical cable is the network cable that comprises of strands of glass fibers within any insulated casing. The fiber optical cables provide significantly higher bandwidth and it could transmit the data over higher distances.
Answer of question 5:
Stage 1: Check whether the name has been registered with using any service like GoDaddy.com
Stage 2: Visit the site Whois.net and discover about the owner of the URL
Stage 3: negotiate with the owner of the URL
Stage 4: Make the required payment for the URL
Stage 5: Gain the URL
References
FitzGerald, J., Dennis, A. and Durcikova, A. (2014). Business data communications and networking.
