The Feminist Wire
First article
In the “Lean in: What Would You Do If You Weren’t Afraid?” Sheryl Sandberg suggests that women should be motivated to aim for leadership roles since they have been traditionally raised and viewed as being less ambitious as compared to their male counterparts. She gives a strong thesis and goes ahead to provide statics to support the same. Sandberg argues that research points to the fact that women are indeed better in leadership compared to men. A study conducted by scholars of the Harvard Business Review showed that women achieved higher scores than men in various categories that included takes the initiative and the ability to communicate effectively (Sandberg). The two also posit that the pressure in society push women to success in an attempt to prove to the men that it is possible. I agree with Sandberg’s opinion since I have grown up in a predominantly patriarch society but have seen great women ascend to leadership roles especially in business owing to their great skill and charismatic nature. Women are also better communicators for they exhibit high emotional intelligence levels that make it easier to identify with others. According to DuBrin and Andrew (2013), the ability to communicate is a key ingredient for effective leadership.
Second article
In the article “Dig Deep: Beyond Lean In,” Bell Hooks is of the opinion that Sandberg employed feminist rhetoric to cover her advocacy for western cultural imperialism especially to white-supremacist capitalist patriarchy. Hooks disagree with Sandberg’s definition of feminism which she holds starts and ends at gender equality which in essence challenges the view of white men being more superior to their females in any aspect. Hooks thinks of feminism from a broader perspective and defines it as a movement that does not necessarily bring up a fight or struggle between the sexes by pitying one against the other (Female against Male and Vice Versa). Bell Hooks views feminism as a movement that should have its goals aimed at ending sexist exploitation, sexism, and oppression based on gender (Hooks). I do agree with Hooks opinion regarding women and feminism. We should go beyond fighting implicit gender barriers and also address the challenges that women face from other sources on their journey up the corporate ladder. Women, who naturally care givers, have to struggle to find a balance between family and career which makes it difficult for them to grow at the same rate as their male colleagues (Karsten and Foegen).
Responses
Brooke Allison
I hold a similar opinion to Allison who identified that work-life flexibility is a great challenge for women who seek to advance their careers. It is indeed hard for a woman to achieve much at the workplace when she has to juggle between taking care of her family and the pressure at work. As natural caregivers, women find themselves giving more attention to family hence underperforming at the workplace. Men should help their women in care giving to accord them a chance to progress at the same pace.
Tyler Washington
I agree with Washington’s sentiments that leadership involves being bold and aggressive for it gives one the platform to be hard. When a woman is looked down upon in whichever forum, she needs to stand up for what she believes in and voice her concerns. I also strongly support Washington’s idea that Sandberg had a narrow view of the challenges faced by women for she did not consider other factors such as race and sexual orientation which are also major contributors to discrimination at the workplace.
Work Cited
Hooks, Bell. “Dig deep: Beyond lean in.” The Feminist Wire (2013).
Sandberg, Sheryl. Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Random House, 2013.
Karsten, Margaret Foegen, ed. Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in the Workplace: Emerging Issues and Enduring Challenges: Emerging Issues and Enduring Challenges. ABC-CLIO, 2016.
DuBrin, Andrew J. Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills. Nelson Education, 2015.
