Book Review: Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection
The main focus of Anna Tsing’s “Friction: an Ethnography of Global Connection” is towards Indonesian rainforest, which is like a space of awkward engagement. This also involves the collection of characters, which are ranging from Nature lovers and illegal loggers and moves towards the crony capitalists and indigenous activist. Almost everyone who comes in between is also involved. The use of awkward is like a metaphorical-analytical tool, which is indicative of friction, which she has explained in her book as “awkward, unequal, unstable, and creative qualities of interconnection across difference (Tsing 2005).” This has been indicative of the methodological challenge across space. This space has been handled by the author gracefully by highlighting the interconnections, which exist between the people and places. It has been highlighted that the author has shown interest in seeing the interconnection that exist for different creatures and this has played a pivotal role in undertaking the examination of universals as the centre-focus of her study (Tsing 2005).
The judgment of Anna on the politics of universal, for example can be explained as, human rights and discourse is of mixed nature. They are representative of both pitfalls and positive potential. As per the view of the author, both success and failure are kind of risks and are worth taking. The author has truly beautifully mingled up the despair and hope, which have played a prominent role in keeping alive the diverse actors in the account of the author. This can be extremely well indicated from “reformulates representations of global capital, remaking the culture and politics of globalization (Tsing 2005).” Thus, it has played a crucial role in handing the myth that globalisation is a kind of unchangeable and greedy bulldozer of hopes rather it has highlighted that globalisation is the open tool, which has helped in developing the potential of handling the contingencies and as well as the push and pull parts of awkward engagement.
As per the conditions of devastation and destruction of the rain forest habitats, the principal result has been a sense if despair, which is communicated by some of co-workers it is worth appreciating that the Anna’s conclusion is of optimistic nature. Along with this, the Ethnography also shows that though the conclusions are optimistic but not in an unfounded way. The author has also highlighted that contingency all and is also surprised and shocked by the diverse articulations, which have been taking around (Tsing 2005). For example, it has been indicated under the structures of new orders that there was potential, and it was being realised by tepid environmental movement. The movement was seen as anti political as it conducted slow and steady work. This movement led to raising questions of freedom and articulated the views of humans, farmers and indigenous rights helped in opening up the spaces for later proliferations of the other movements. These movements have to be contended with violent combination of legality and illegality, big and small companies, etc. (Tsing 2005)
It has been indicated in the first few chapters of the book, which are based on frontiers and economies of violence. It becomes extremely important to cite a text from the book, which has highlighted the thoughts of the authors towards the issue of frontiers. The text is “Built from historical models of European conquest, frontiers create wildness so that some—and not others—may reap its rewards. Frontiers are unregulated because they arise in the interstitial places made by collaborations among legitimate and illegitimate partners: armies and bandits; gangsters and corporations; builders and despoilers. They confuse the boundaries of law and theft, governance and violence, use and destruction (Tsing 2005).”
Further, the author has also elaborated that frontier is not a natural or local category. It is like a travelling theory of a foreign form, which requires translations. Along with this, it can also be quoted as “The frontier is made in the shifting terrain between legality and illegality, public and private ownership, brutal rape and passionate charisma, ethnic collaboration and hostility, violence and law, restoration and extermination (Tsing 2005).” The author has very beautifully explained the problems of globalisation and the friction that is shaped by these problems.
Anna has laid focus on particular zone of awkward engagement, which is related to the rainforest of Indonesia. There was a fascinating reshape in the landscape with the use of corporate design. As a result of capitalist actions, the environmental movements arose in order to defend the rainforest. The book has provided a portfolio of methods, which can be used to study the global connections. In her book, the author has highlighted the curiosity and creativity that exist in the clutch of worldly encounter. It also played an active role in understating how this crucial issue is disregarded in the contemporary theories designed at the global level (Tsing 2005). With her book Anna has made a significant contribution in the area of globalisation and natural resources. The author has made use of a pleasurable and informative medium to communicate her thoughts to the readers.
If you want HR management Assignment Help study samples to help you write professional custom essay’s and essay writing help.
Receive assured help from our talented and expert writers! Did you buy assignment and assignment writing services from our experts in a very affordable price.
To get more information, please contact us or visit www.myassignmenthelp.Com
