Project management faces numerous difficulties, including many ethical challenges that project managers regularly experience. The main issue in project management involves how organizations should protect stakeholder backing while providing truthful project status updates. The dilemma appears when organization members face unachievable deadlines, funding limitations, and disagreements between stakeholder priorities. Project integrity and success suffer significant degradation when ethical problems such as misrepresentation of project status combine with conflicts of interest. The solution demands transparent ethical standards, preventive approaches, and established ethical standards to solve these challenges. Project managers who build transparent, accountable environments successfully avoid dilemmas and deliver projects with intact organizational values. All project management activities must adopt ethical behaviour as their fundamental principle. Numerous organizations invest financially in projects with many stakeholder groups and multiple complex connections between them. The emergence of ethical dilemmas creates risks that endanger project success and harm the organization’s reputation and stakeholder trust. Project failure occurs when decision-makers experience bias because of conflicts of interest and misrepresentation, leading stakeholders to build incorrect expectations. Decisions made by project managers require an ethical framework because it ensures both their effectiveness and moral validity. This paper investigates ethical problems in project management, particularly emphasizing conflicting alignments between project managers and the distortion of project performance indicators. We will research the fundamental factors and the outcome effects of these issues, followed by a review of strategies organizations need to solve these problems. Project managers who understand these challenges and establish proactive methods will effectively solve ethical problems and finish their projects successfully and ethically.
Conflicts of interest are among the most commonly encountered ethical dilemmas in project management. These conflicts arise when the individual self-interest of a manager clashes with the official role and responsibilities of such an individual and, therefore, the project at hand (Hansen, 2023). For example, suppose a project manager offers contracts to their relatives or friends instead of the best suppliers. In that case, the project results may worsen, and the company’s image may be compromised. According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), lack of honesty and integrity, which includes conflict of interest, has contributed to 30% of project failures (Project Management Institute, 2023). This figure calls for greater ethical scrutiny when it comes to the management of projects.
Some potential conflicts of interest relate to financial ties, employment, gifts and entertainment, and any close relationships, as well as conflict arising from holding multiple positions and using inside information. Self-interests, for instance, could be where a project manager has an interest in a particular vendor or contractor, for example, by being an investor in that firm, or they may be friends with the firm’s owners (Monk, 2013). This situation leads to a biased approach to decision-making when selecting a particular vendor, which may not be the most suitable in terms of cost, quality, or reliability. Likewise, the same project manager who is screening to work with a specific vendor in the future is likely to make decisions that are beneficial to that company only, which is detrimental to both the authenticity of the project and its results (Monk, 2013).
Other conflicts of interest that can arise from gifts and hospitality from vendors are that they can make the employee feel indebted, thus making them make biased decisions. It is easy for a project manager to feel compelled to pay back the favor with a contract or decision ben fits that may not reflect fairness. One’s friends and other acquaintances can also shape the decisions of a project manager (Monk, 2013). For instance, where there is a romantic entanglement with a stakeholder, issues such as favoritism are bound to emerge, disrupting the team and the project’s overall success.
Another disadvantage of having multiple reports within an organization is that the personnel involved might develop conflicts of interest. A project manager who often takes another position, like a procurement officer, will likely experience role conflict. Such balancing leads to compromising one role against the other rather than advancing the specific interests of the project (Project Management Institute, 2023). Further, the use of information that is considered privileged learned from a different position or in a different project can be wrongful and unlawful. This is likely to be used by a project manager for the benefit of their current project or a self-interest, thereby leading to a breakup of trust within the industry and legal implications.
Potential conflicts of interest need to be declared and addressed within organizations engaged in contract research organization to avoid conflict of interest. A good example of a preventive measure is ensuring that vendors are selected relatively and squarely through criteria development so that the business ends up with the best vendors (Monk, 2013). Using such measures makes the process fairer and helps increase the probability of success and recognition of the project among the target audience.
It is possible to suggest several approaches for managing conflict of interest within organizations: Organizations should conduct consistent ethical training where employees can learn how to avoid ethical dilemmas (Hansen, 2023). Measures should be implemented, especially if the breach of moral standards is actionable, so that individuals understand and avoid such behaviors. Such decisions and major contracts may be reviewed independently to eliminate bias, whilst whistleblower provisions may promote reporting ethically questionable situations without the fear of retribution (Smith, 2022). In this way, organizations can identify these conflicts and prevent them from compromising the ethicality of project management, thus ensuring that the integrity of their projects is well protected.
The second ethical issue that has been identified in project management is the reporting of incorrect project status. It occurs when the project managers give out fake or incomplete information regarding the progress, risks, or the general conditions of the project. As the Denver International Airport baggage handling system failure shows, the possible repercussions for practicing such ethical standards are dire (Calleam.com, 2023). Specifically, the absence of integrated transparency and reality distortion on final costs resulted in time extension and a total of $560 million cost overrunning (MBR Project Solutions, 2023). The lack of disclosure of the issues further compounded the problems, thus bringing out the effects of misrepresentation.
The Standish Group, in its studies, revealed that 52% of projects undergo scope creep through misleading project status information. This paper identified this factor as significant to project failure (Standish Group, 2020). These statistics show how common this problem is and how it could endanger projects. Misrepresentation thus means setting low requirements or goals, creating undue expectations, and improperly assessing risk, which can contribute to project failure (Standish Group, 2020). For instance, a project manager with a financial stake in the vendor/contractor may bias decision-making by favoring the preferred vendor/contractor (Noonpi Blog, 2023). This negative consequence can lead to increased costs, poor quality, or time delays, affecting the credibility and reliability of the project management process.
Misrepresentation can include underestimation and minimization of risks, exaggeration of achievements, and failure to report emerging challenges. Project managers may be pressured to create a positive perception of the project for the stakeholders when the reality is otherwise. It can stem from the organizational culture, the potential repercussions, or what stakeholders may expect from them (Noonpi Blog, 2023). However, the consequence of misrepresentation can be highly dire: the project could fail, the organization may incur a loss, and the reputation of the organization will also be affected.
Overstatement of progress is one of the most common forms of misrepresentation. Managers may overstate when a project is on schedule or even progressing beyond schedule. This may lead to a smokescreen within the stakeholders’ camp and, thus, ineffective risk management and decision-making (Noonpi Blog, 2023). For instance, when a project manager provides a progress update claiming that a project milestone has been achieved while it has not, stakeholders may be slow to act as they are persuaded that no further resources or funds from them are needed in the project.
Misrepresentation is another form of bias; one such example is the tendency of investors to understate the risks available. Managers may sometimes overlook or deny the existence of risks to avoid upset stakeholders or look weak by admitting that risks are involved. This creates problems with risk management, and there is no readiness when disasters occur (Noonpi Blog, 2023). For instance, if a project manager omits a critical risk like delayed delivery of essential goods and services, the stakeholders will likely not intervene and correct the issue, leading to project delay and added costs.
Another misrepresentation is the attempt to hide specific issues that have cropped up within an organization. Managers may choose not to report or minimize the effects of problems because such action may result in loss of stakeholder support or even disciplinary action against the managers themselves. This may result in distrust due to what some deem as the withholding of information (Noonpi Blog, 2023). For instance, if a project manager hides a big problem, like a significant cost over execution, the stakeholders will pull their support, resulting in project failure.
Ethics is an essential component and should be addressed in any project; it can only be solved through early intervention and change of culture. One of the best ways to prevent ethical breaches is by providing training. These training sessions prepare the project managers to deal with moral dilemmas when making decisions relevant to projects (Nguyen, 2024). For example, companies could organize quarterly workshops about real-life business-related ethical issues and their plausible solutions.
As the Ethics and Compliance Initiative has indicated, promoting high-quality ethics programs can reduce corporate unethical behaviors by 36% (Ethics & Compliance Initiative, 2023). This shows the potential of a good ethics program to minimize unethical behavior in an organization. By practicing integrity in organizations, the employees and stakeholders will trust the project managers and act according to what is suitable for all (Impactly, 2024).
Another critical step is to develop a clear code of ethics that accurately lays down rules of acceptable conduct. In this case, this code should offer benchmarks in ethics and set expectant standards of conduct. Further, the organization should encourage easy reporting of unethical practices by offering means like an ethics officer or a hotline (Hansen, 2023). The following measures not only assist in avoiding ethical infringements but also remind people that ethical standards are vital in managing successful projects.
Aside from training and policies, there are other ways through which organizations can prevent the appearance of ethical issues in the management of projects. It is advisable to conduct adherence reviews or assessments at least every month because they can assist in uncovering and preventing ethical violations before they worsen (Impactly, 2024). Big contracts’ final decisions and terms can also benefit from independent analysis for balance and fairness. One advantage of whistleblower protection is that it promotes organizations’ ethical standards, as employees are free to report violations without being punished. Implementing these sound preventative and corrective measures may put organizations in a good position to foster an ethical culture and address ethical challenges (Nguyen, 2024). This not only contributes to the credibility of project management but also adds to the success and prestige of the organization.
An example of ethical dilemmas at work can be illustrated by the story of Tom, a project manager working on a construction site. Tom experienced difficulties in his supply chain with raw materials, which provoked difficulties in timely production due to unforeseen bureaucratic issues (HogoNext, 2024). He was faced with either reporting the full extent of these problems to management or waiting until he had a proper strategy for dealing with them.
It was strategic since its outcome determined investor perceptions and the project’s success. On the one hand, immediate disclosure maintained the ethical standards of transparency by making the stakeholders understand all the information revealed. On the other hand, if the information was kept secret until the best plan to handle the situation was formulated, it might be perceived as secrecy, which is a sign of dishonesty (HogoNext, 2024). Tom finally opts for a reason, the middle ground. He was transparent with stakeholders in explaining the challenges and their effects, giving a detailed account of what it would entail in the project. At the same time, he also provided a new action plan to address the challenges that have caused the delays and effectively manage the costs.
This approach of fostering a balance between different parties ensured stakeholders’ trust was maintained while showing that Tom was more proactive in managing pitfalls. Tom’s case also points out the need to be more open while dealing with ethical issues and to take the initiative in conflict resolution (HogoNext, 2024). Tom was genuine about the faculty’s problems and the solutions he was willing to offer his supporters to retain their investment. This unwound the ethical issue on the spot and enhanced the trust and rapport with the project team’s stakeholders (HogoNext, 2024).
In conclusion, issues, risks, and concerns like conflict of interest and professional misrepresentation are significant ethical questions crucial in project management and need well-articulated policies and countermeasures. It is essential to address these issues as they will speak a lot about accountabilities within the project teams. By adopting strict measures for tackling conflict of interest, insisting on high standards of ethical reporting, and offering adequate courses in business ethics to project managers, organizations can effectively prepare to meet ethical dilemmas. Moreover, creating an organizational culture of ethical behavior while ensuring that unethical behavior is punished immediately could play a vital role in improving the general standards of project management. So, steps to recognizing and following ethical norms help a project manager avoid being a part of corrupt systems and implement successful projects with positive results that can be relied upon. The fact that moral issues are recognized not only preserves the success of these projects but also contributes to the formation of positive readiness for further cooperation among the stakeholders, which contributes to the overall long-term success of the organization. That said, it is essential to note that ethical conflicts arise in project management. However, it is possible to avoid these conflicts with the help of clear guidelines, general preventative measures, and a strict ethical foundation. Legitimate project management encompasses transparency, accountability, and integrity to ensure that projects are practical and moral. Therefore, this publication must embrace ethical practices to achieve stakeholder confidence and sustainable organizational success.
References
Calleam.com. (2023). Baggage system. Denver International Airport. https://calleam.com/WTPF/wp-content/uploads/articles/DIABaggage.pdf
Ethics & Compliance Initiative. (2023). Client-side project management capabilities: Dealing with ethical dilemmas. Global Business Ethics Survey.
Hansen, A. (2023). Eight ways to develop more effective ethics training for employees. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/ethics-training-for-employees-ways-develop-effective
HogoNext. (2024). Project management and ethical dilemmas: seven case studies in leadership ethics cases. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.
Impactly. (2024). Ethics training examples: six successful programs that were conducted. https://www.getimpactly.com/post/ethics-training-examples
MBR Project Solutions, LLC. (2023). Denver baggage fiasco: A project management case study. https://www.mbrprojectsolutions.com/blog/project-management-case-study-denver-baggage-fiasco
Monk, C. (2013). My project is failing, it is not my fault. Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/communication-method-content-in-project-9937
Nguyen, T. (2024). The best seven examples of ethics training programs of 2024. https://flearningstudio.com/7-examples-of-ethics-training-program-of-2023/
Noonpi Blog. (2023). The Denver International Airport automated baggage-handling system. https://noonpi.com/the-denver-international-airport-automated-baggage-handling-system/
Project Management Institute. (2023). Ethical issues in project management. Project management and ethical dilemmas: seven case studies.
Smith, J. (2022). The Denver airport baggage system fiasco. Journal of Project Management. Sample Ethics Cases | PMI – Project Management Institute.
Standish Group. (2020). Chaos report 2020: Beyond infinity. https://www.successthroughsafe.com/blog-1/2021/11/13/standish-chaos-report-2021
