Article Critique
The article “In Pursuit of Simple, Ordinary Justice” by Robert F. Muse seeks to investigate the United States criminal justice system in serving justice to the American people. The author seeks to provide insights, opinions along with wisdom by examining the role of the American Criminal Law Review (ACLR) 50 years down the lane. The author provides own experience in the US criminal justice system and being one of the editors of the article, provides comprehensive overview of the article regarding the issue of the criminal justice system in the US. The author starts with the personal experience in the Supreme Court situated in the District of Columbia (Muse 317). Specifically, the article examines two important themes in the US criminal justice system that includes the prison system, as well as the role of counsel in then criminal justice system in the US. These tow themes forms the fundamental aspects that the author explores all through the article. The article offers insightful statistics on the prison system and the role of counsel in the US criminal justice system that makes the article very interesting throughout.
The author asserts that the US prison system comprise the most vile, most deprived, as well as most racist element of the criminal justice system. The US prison system has been criticized in many instances as not delivering justice to the prisoners. This comes at the backdrop that the US should be a leading democracy in the world when it comes to effective criminal justice system that promotes justice (Gopnik 1). However, this is not the case on the US prison system as the system has many flaws with the most monstrous system of injustice. The author clearly demonstrates this observation through pertinent statistics. The author asserts that in the US, with around 5 percent of the global populace has about 25% of the prisoners in the world with the greatest imprisonment rates than any other country globally at a price of around $75 billion annually. In addition, there are around 2.3 million individuals in prisons besides jails in the US. This demonstrates that the US prison system is wanting because it is expected that population of the prisoners should be much less than what it is now. The author further makes an observation that there are over 60 percent of the individuals from racial along with ethnic minorities and in some states; 80-90 percent of the offenders in prison are mainly African Americans (Greg 1). Moreover, the author points out that in 2011, in District of Columbia Supreme Court, 2,514 individuals were convicted in crime cases; about 2,395 (95.3 percent) were blacks (Muse 319). This shows that the criminal justice system is biased because it cannot be a coincidence that the majority of the prisoners are from the minority groups. The number of blacks and other minority groups being convicted of felony and other crimes are higher, which indicates the criminal justice system is racists in nature (Will 1).
Furthermore, the author claims that there is the growing number of for-profit sector that benefits from the billions money in the form of proceeds from the prison populace. In then US, there are many investors that are finding a lucrative business in offering corrective services to the prison population that is geared to benefit these investors rather than the prison population. The author was keen to observe that the investors usually lobby legislators to offer them contracts to offer services in prisons in the US (Falk 69). This trend shows that the prison system in the US is in a mess and is controlled by outside forces to benefit from the millions allocated to correction services. This implies that the criminal justice system has been compromised to benefit investors rather than helping the convicted persons, which is immoral and unjust practice in the US criminal justice system (Muse 321).
The second theme that the author addressed is the role the counsel towards reforming the criminal justice system in the US that has continue to undermine justice to those seeking it. The article supports his claims through the book that lately published entitled “The Collapse of American Justice System” book that was written Stuntz J. William. The author of the book believes that a bad structure may lead to dehumanizing besides unjust outcomes (Stuntz 23). The author believes that the current Bill of Rights has generated much unfairness because the counsels dealing with justice process concentrate much on the process rather than justice. Thus, the criminal justice system as an entire, which include its procedures, as well as rules to make sure that simple justice prevail may be realized by a single judge or attorney. It is apparent from the article that the individual lawyers have missed out on prospects for simple justice plus there is no one to challenge them for, where the outcomes have been grave to the criminal justice system (Monroe 3). The author articulates his points through the book “Ordinary Injustice” How America Holds Court” by Amy Batch. Batch believes that injustice prevails when the society of legal experts becomes so familiarized to a model of lapses, which they may not see their duty in their roles (Bach 28). Like Stuntz, Amy believes that bad procedures in the criminal justice system by lawyers or legal experts are causing injustice. It is recommended that the role of the individual lawyer is to make sure that their attitudes and decisions should play diverse roles in the criminal justice system by delivering “ordinary” or “simple” justice (Muse 322).
The author further provides her experience working at Public Defender Service (PDS) where he experienced many instances where justice was served and some instances was not. The author explains that there were many prosecutors that ensured that justice were served to those seeking it. Based on his experience of his father’s case, the author believes that one lawyer can accomplish great things in ensuring that justice is served towards promoting justice in the criminal law (Muse 323).
Overall, the article was not very straightforward in the start and it was not until the third page of the article that one realizes the main topics explored. There is the need for more concise introduction that will make many people read the article. Generally, the article is good and well-written with a crucial message concerning the need to reform the criminal justice system, especially the US prison system and the role of lawyers and other legal experts.
Work Cited
Bach, Amy. Ordinary Injustice: How America Holds Court. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2013. Print.
Falk, Gerhard. The American Criminal Justice System: How It Works, How It Doesn’t, and How to Fix It. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2010. Print.
Gopnik, Adam. The Caging of America. New Yorker. Retrieved July 28, 2018 from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/01/30/the-caging-of-america.
Greg, Bishop. A Company That Runs Prisons Will Have Its Name on a Stadium. The New York Times. 2013. Retrieved July 28, 2018 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/20/sports/ncaafootball/a-company-that-runs-prisons- will-have-its-name-ona-stadium.html?pagewantedall&_r0.
Monroe, Albert. Rebuilding Justice: A Review of the Collapse of American Criminal Justice, by William J. Stuntz. 2012. Student Scholarship Papers. Paper 121.
Muse. Robert, F. In Pursuit of Simple, Ordinary Justice. American Criminal Law Review, 51, 317-326, 2014.
Stuntz, William J. The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011. Print.
Will, F. George. George Will: The torture of solitary confinement. The Washington Post. 2013. Retrieved July 28, 2018 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-the- torture of-solitary-confinement/2013/02/20/ae115d74-7ac9-11e2-9a75 dab0201670da_story.html?utm_term=.903e929f03ba.
