Society assignment essay help on: Democracy in a society
Democracy can be called as a gift to a society which further paves the way to glory. Every nation or state is guided by a particular set of principles, they are those guiding steps in a constitution that are directly associated with the public interest. In fact that remains the prime duty of the government towards its state. It is the people who chose the lead of their state with certain expectations; they are the needs of the masses which therefore become duties that should be fulfilled at the part of the governing body. The relationship which a citizen of a nation state forms with the governing body has to be nurtured on the basis of faith, reliability and cooperation. But it is important to reflect upon the irony, which raises a doubt whether the public itself is aware of the rights they have and the well-being that they should be privileged with. There is a proper law that recognizes the public interest, and according to Edwin Rekosh (Executive Director), The Global Network for Public Interest Law, advocates that “public interest law does not describe a body of law or a legal field; the term was adopted to describe whom the public interest lawyers were representing, rather than what matters they would work on. Instead of representing powerful economic interests, they chose to be advocates for those living in poverty. The term has grown, however, to encompass a broader range of activities of lawyers and non-lawyers working toward civil rights, civil liberties, women’s rights, consumer rights, environmental protection, and ‘fighting for the little guy’; – that is, representing vulnerable segments of society.” Now the question is whether the public is aware of the rights they possess or not? It would be unfortunate if the case is not so, because that would mean the relationship between the public and politicians is implicit and the most needed factor of trust is blurred. The association would be dishonest at the part of the governing body and would be innocent at the part of public who doesn’t know the law that should guide their well-being and living conditions. This circumstance that has been insensitively created by the law, is strange especially in a mobile phase like today because the age of information is not helping out the targeted, and unluckily it is fostering the crude interests of the lawyers who themselves are not abiding the law.After having a look at what exactly the public know and what it should have known, it is important to reflect upon the following example:Singapore Rebel, Martyn See’s first film, that was made four years ago, was initially barred by the Singapore Government, but later it got the release approval. It was the first partisan film to be passed after the Film Act law was amended. Also, more recently the video recording of the speech given by Martyn Lee was banned by the Singapore Government, which show cased the prior political prisoner Dr Lim Hock Siew, the report was shunned by the Ministry of Informations, Communications and the Arts as “The film gives a distorted and misleading portrayal of Dr Lim’s arrests and detention under the Internal Security Act (ISA) in 1963. The Singapore Government will not allow individuals who have posed a security threat to Singapore’s interests in the past, to use media platforms such as films to make baseless accusations against the authorities, give a false portrayal of their previous activities in order to exculpate their guilt and undermine public confidence in the Government in the process.” As a remark given by the Prime Minister of Singapore, that it is an ‘open society’, the same is paradoxical in itself as it goes against the action that government took alongside Martyn Lee and also banning of the video. Truly, if it was a government working for the interests of the public, then it shouldn’t have been one of the examples going unfavorable at the part of this nation.It is significant for the people to know about the intricacies of the governmental procedures. It is their right to have a look at the functioning of the governing body especially when it comes to work for its citizens. As highlighted above that the Public interests’ lawyers usually work for the most weak and vulnerable sections of the society, then the people have to know about the conditions they are being circumscribed in. It is the duty of the government to make a healthy communication possible at a mass level to relate to the devised policies. It is usually a theoretical framework which the judiciary sets up for its own state.